Skip to main content
Log in

An investigation into the relationships between gender and language

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation focused upon the impact of gender and various “powerful” and “less powerful” linguistic features on the communication of unfamiliar male and female college students. Same-sex and mixed-sex dyads were recorded as they engaged in discussions regarding suggestions for a bogus freshman orientation booklet. Although few gender differences were found, the result of a factor analysis yielded three factors: questions, suggestions, and process variables. These factors are consistent with a power perspective in the use of various linguistic features. However, the present findings suggest that gender and power alone cannot explain differences in communication styles. Rather, the results suggest the need to consider other aspects of the speaker to explain differences that occur in the use of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard J. (1968). The sex game. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women's speech: An empirical examination. Communication Monographs, 48, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M., & De Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypothesis. Language in Society, 6, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drass, K. A. (1986). The effect of gender identity on conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 294–301.

  • Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. (1975). The question of tag questions in women's speech: They don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, 4, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakins, B. W., & Eakins, R. G. (1978). Sex differences in human communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelsky, C. (1979). Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society, 8, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. M. (1978a). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. M. (1978b). What do couples talk about when they're alone? In D. Butturff & E. L. Epstein (Eds.); Women's language style. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 616–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1981). Gender differences in interrupting behavior: A dominance perspective. International Journal of Women's Studies, 4, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollack, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell-Ginet, S. (1975). Our father tongue: Essay in linguistic politics. Diacritics, 5, 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., Kane, M. L., & Robey, C. S. (1981). Sex differences in story receipt and story sequencing behaviors in dyadic conversations. Human Communication Research, 7, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. R., Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Gale, W. S. (1977). Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles, 3, 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M., & Atkins, B. K. (1980). “Women's language” or “powerless language”? In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, & N. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R. T. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskin, W. F., & John, V. P. (1963). The study of spontaneous talk. In R. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style. Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rawley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshay, D. W. (1972). Sex differences in language style. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women. Lexington, MA: Xerox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1982). Why can't a woman be more like a man? Work and Occupations, 9, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24, 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simkins-Bullock, J.A., Wildman, B.G. An investigation into the relationships between gender and language. Sex Roles 24, 149–160 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288888

Keywords

Navigation