Skip to main content
Log in

A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper an experimental design is introduced for the analysis of the conceptual categories used by subjects when stereotyping males and females. Subjects were asked to name as many familiar types of women and men as they could think of, and describe them in terms of various characteristic properties (e.g., traits, attitudes, interests, skills, and demographic features). The most frequently mentioned types were then sorted by a second sample according to their perceived similarity. Finally, a third group of subjects categorized the initial set of properties in terms of their relevance to either male or female types. Clustering and scaling analyses yielded a clear cut picture of the cognitive ordering principles underlying gender stereotypes. Distinct property clusters were found for the female and male types, underlining the important role of gender stereotypes in the knowledge base of the subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Tumia, M. L. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. I. A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 510–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, S. S., & Snell, W. E. (1986). Beliefs about women: Components and correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, J. I., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. (1977). The PRE-Andro Scale: Users manual. University of Kentucky, Department of Psychology.

  • Berzins, J. I., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 655–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1985). Gender stereotypes: Some thoughts on the cognitive organization of gender-related information. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Components of gender stereotypes. Psychological Documents, 13, 25. (Catalogue No. 2583).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). The structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men in social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (1986a). A BASIC program package for the analysis of sorting data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 472–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (1986b). Confirmatory methods in cluster analysis. In W. Gaul & M. Schader (Eds.). Classification as a tool of research. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (1989). A quantitative evaluation of sex differences in implicit personality theories. Archives of Psychology, 141, 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S. (1980). Cluster analysis (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L. J. (1987). Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis. New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L. J., & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignments as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 190–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.) (Vol. 4). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. A. (1986). Gender identity: Development and consequences. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1977). The relationship between multidimensional scaling and clustering. In J. van Ryzin (Ed.), Classification and clustering. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noseworthy, C. M., & Lott, A. J. (1984). The cognitive organization of gender-stereotypic categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C., & Salovey, P. (1985). Cognitive structures, cognitive processes, and cognitive-behavior modification: I. Client issues. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Bennett, S. M. (1975). The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective checklist. Sex Roles, 1, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Kay Deaux for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Six, B., Eckes, T. A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles 24, 57–71 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288703

Keywords

Navigation