Abstract
A study was conducted to determine usefulness of the Falbo and Peplau model for understanding the power strategies and marital satisfaction of 42 nonstudent married couples. In addition, this study examined the impact of imbalanced resources on power strategy use and marital satisfaction. Overall, the results supported the hypothesis that people who see themselves as Equal Partners are more satisfied with their relationship than Traditional Partners. The results also indicated that Equal Partners reported using fewer strategies overall in trying to get their way. Thus, the greater use of power strategies may be associated with being in an imbalanced resource relationship, such as a traditional marriage. Furthermore, the results of this study supported the expectation that marital dissatisfaction is associated with the use of indirect strategies. Although husbands and wives overall were not found to differ in their power strategy use, there was a suggestion that traditional wives used more power strategies, regardless of type, than traditional husbands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billings, A. (1979). Conflict resolution in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 368–376.
Birchler, G. R., Weiss, R. L., & Vincent, J. P. (1975). Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 31, 349–360.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A re-examination. American Sociological Review, 36, 264–278.
Cowan, G., Drinkard, J., & MacGavin, L. (1984). The effects of target, age, and gender on use of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1391–1398.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Winkle, J. (1979). You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 27, 3–11.
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: External investigation. New York: Academic Press.
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.
Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.
Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmore & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Instone, D., Major, B., & Bunker, B. B. (1983). Gender, self-confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322–333.
Jacobson, N. S. (1984). The modification of cognitive processes in behavioral marital therapy: Integrating cognitive and behavioral intervention strategies. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: The Guilford Press.
Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 12, 383–396.
Johnson, P. (1978). Women and interpersonal power. In I. H. Frieze, J. E. Parsons, P B. Johnson, D. N. Ruble, & G. L. Zellman (Eds.), Women and sex roles. New York: Norton.
Kipnis, D. (1984) The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research based theories. (Vol. 1) New York: The Free Press.
McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841–854.
Navran, L. (1967). Communication and adjustment in marriage. Family Process, 6, 173–184.
Olson, D. H., & Ryder, R. G. (1970). Inventory of marital conflicts (INC): An experimental interaction procedure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 443–448.
Ort, R. S. (1950). A study of role-conflicts as related to happiness in marriage. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 691–699.
Patterson, G. R., & Hops, H. (1972). Coercion, a game for two: Intervention techniques for marital conflict. In R. E. Urich & P. Mounjoy (Eds.), The experimental analysis of social behavior. New York: Appleton-Centure-Crofts.
Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. B. (1970). Reciprocity and coercion: Two facets of social systems. In J. L. Michael & C. Neuringer (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Pikes, G. R., & Sillars, A. L. (1985). Reprocity of marital communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 303–324.
Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. (1974). Communication, conflict, and marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Raven, B. H., Centers, R., & Rodrigues, A. (1975). The bases of conjugal power. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Sage.
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The study of family power structure: A review, 1960–1969. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 539–552.
Sawin, L. L. (1985). Dating violence: A prospectus draft. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social processes and power in families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research-based theories (Vol. 1). New York: The Free Press.
Schaap, C. (1984). A comparison of the interaction of distressed and nondistressed married couples in a laboratory situation: Literature survey, methodological issues, and an empirical investigation. In K. Hallweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: The Guilford Press.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
Szinocacz, M. E. (1981). Relationship among marital power measures: A critical review and an empirical test. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 12, 151–169.
Weiss, R. L., Hops, H., & Patterson, G. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict, technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. C. Hondy, & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Behavior Change: Methodology, Concept, and Practice (pp. 309–342). Campaign, IL: Research Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was based upon the first author's doctoral dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aida, Y., Falbo, T. Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles 24, 43–56 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702