Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 24, Issue 1–2, pp 31–41 | Cite as

Sexual victimization among sorority women: Exploring the link between sexual violence and institutional practices

  • Stacey Copenhaver
  • Elizabeth Grauerholz
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the incidence and nature of sexual coercion among sorority women. Particular emphasis is placed on sexual coercion that occurs within the context of fraternal life. Overall, almost half of those studied had experienced some form of sexual coercion, 24% experienced attempted rape, and 17% were victims of completed rape. Almost half of the rapes occurred in a fraternity house, and over half occurred either during a fraternity function or was perpetrated by a fraternity member. This study provides evidence that fraternities represent a social context that tolerates, if not actually encourages, sexual coercion of women, including sorority women.

Keywords

Social Psychology Social Context Sexual Violence Sexual Victimization Sexual Coercion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ageton, S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ehrhart, J. K., & Sandler, B. R. (1985). Campus gang rape: party games? Association of American Colleges: Project on the Status and Education of Women.Google Scholar
  3. Kanin, E. J., & Parcell, S. R. (1977). Sexual aggression: A second look at the offended female. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 67–76.Google Scholar
  4. Kirkpatrick, C., & Kanin, E. J. (1967). Male sex aggression on a university campus. American Sociological Review, 22, 52–58.Google Scholar
  5. Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212.Google Scholar
  6. Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242–250.Google Scholar
  7. Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.Google Scholar
  8. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.Google Scholar
  9. Koss, M. P. Gidycz, C. A. & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.Google Scholar
  10. Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: a discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society, 3, 457–473.Google Scholar
  12. O'Shaughnessey, M. E., & Palmer, C. (1990). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  13. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacey Copenhaver
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Grauerholz
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations