Sex Roles

, Volume 24, Issue 9–10, pp 639–650 | Cite as

Traditional gender role beliefs and individual outcomes: An exploratory analysis

  • Leonard P. Stark
Article

Abstract

The results of a survey administered to 806 undergraduate students serve as the basis for analyzing the relationships among traditional gender roles, same-sex intimacy, and homophobia. High levels of homophobia and low levels of intimacy were found among those who believe strongly in the traditional roles. Previous research has shown both homophobia and a lack of intimacy to be harmful to individuals and for society. The present findings may, therefore, constitute empirical evidence of the negative effects of gender roles. Sex differences found in the survey results also support this contention. A general model of the consequences of traditional gender role beliefs for those who hold these views is also speculated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, M. (1988). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, M. & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Sex Differences in Same-Sex Friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–731.Google Scholar
  4. Churchill, W. (1967). Homosexual behavior among males. New York: Hawthorn Books.Google Scholar
  5. Daniel, D. G., Abernethy, V., & Oliver, W. R. (1984). Correlations between female sex roles and attitudes toward male sexual dysfunctions in thirty women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 10, 160–169.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, L. R. (1981). Pressure and pretense: Living with gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 7, 331–347.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, J. L., & Narus, L. R., Jr. (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same sex and other sex relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 444–455.Google Scholar
  11. Grunebaum, H. (1976). Thoughts on sex, love, and commitment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 2, 277–283.Google Scholar
  12. Hood, R. W. (1973). Dogmatism and opinions about mental illness. Psychological Reports, 32, 1283–1290.Google Scholar
  13. Larwood, L., & Wood, M. M. (1977). Women in management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, R. A. (1978). Emotional Intimacy Among Men. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 108–121.Google Scholar
  15. Lumby, M. E. (1976). Homophobia: The quest for a valid scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 39–47.Google Scholar
  16. MacDonald, A. P., Jr. (1970). A revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798.Google Scholar
  17. MacDonald, A. P., Jr. (1974). Identification and measurement of multidimensional attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 165–182.Google Scholar
  18. MacDonald, A. P., Jr., & Games, R. G. (1974). Some characteristics of those who hold positive and negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 9–27.Google Scholar
  19. McGill, M. E. (1985). The McGill report on male intimacy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  20. Millham, J., & Weinberger, L. E. (1977). Sexual preference, sex role appropriateness, and restriction of social access. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 343–357.Google Scholar
  21. Millham, J., San Miguel, C. L., & Kellogg, R. (1976). A factor-analytic conceptualization of attitudes toward male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 3–10.Google Scholar
  22. Morin, S. F., & Garfinkle, E. M. (1978). Male homophobia, Journal of Social Issues, 34, 29–47.Google Scholar
  23. Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 211–219.Google Scholar
  24. Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. Rubin, Z. (1980). Children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, K. T. (1971). Homophobia: A tentative personality profile. Psychological Reports, 29, 1091–1094.Google Scholar
  27. Steffensmeier, D., & Steffensmeier, R. (1974). Sex differences in reactions to homosexuals: Research continuities and further developments. The Journal of Sex Research, 10, 52–67.Google Scholar
  28. Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy in men's friendships. In B. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, E. H., Jr., Grisanti, C., & Pleck, J. H. (1985). Attitudes toward the male role and their correlates. Sex Roles, 13, 413–427.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.Google Scholar
  31. Weinberger, L. E., & Millham, J. (1979). Attitudinal homophobia and support of traditional sex roles. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 237–246.Google Scholar
  32. Weitzman, L. (1979). Sex role socialization: A focus on women. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, D. G. (1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, P. H. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard P. Stark
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareUSA

Personalised recommendations