Skip to main content
Log in

Gift-giving roles and gender self-concepts

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on current research on sex roles and on the working self-concept, the present study considers the constructs of masculinity (instrumentality) and femininity (expressiveness) in different gift-giving contexts and how they may vary on a within-individual basis. Results indicated that males described themselves differently in terms of masculine and feminine traits when buying gifts for same-sex friends as opposed to for opposite-sex friends. Females tended to be more consistent across these two situations. However, both sexes felt more comfortable in giving gifts to the same sex but reported more intense feelings in giving to the opposite sex. Biological sex was a better predictor than Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) sex type of changes in self-descriptions, reported feelings and attitudes, and gift chosen. The BSRI was useful as a measure of the instrumental and expressive aspects of the self-concept in specific situations, but not as a way to identify groups that respond differently to gender cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banikotes, P. G., Neimeyer, G. J., & Lepowsky, C. (1981). Gender and sex role orientation effects on friendship choice. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 7, 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep. American Psychologist, 37, 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. B., Nappi, B. J., & Hoza, B. (1987). A test of Aristotle's model of friendship for young adults' same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T. (1982). Christmas gifts and kin networks. American Sociological Review, 47, 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal, D. (1987). ‘Showing them you love them’: Gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy. The Sociological Review, 35, 150–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cota, A. A., & Dion, K. L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M., & Williams, S. (1987). Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles, 17, 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Stern, B. B. (1989). Gender schema and fashion consciousness. Psychology and Marketing, 6, 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex typing. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, L. (1983). The salience of relevant others and its effects on individual and joint preferences: An experimental investigation. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10, 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G. (1982). Predicting behavioral consistency from an individual's perception of situational similarities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1076–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Kunda, K. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. (1986). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny. Sex Roles, 14, 397–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E., & Oliver, R. R. (1987). Intimacy and structure: Sex differences in imagery of same-sex relationships. Sex Roles, 6, 539–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J., & Padawer-Singer, A. (1976). Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 743–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., & Winton, W. (1979). Effects of household sex composition in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Heron, C. A., & Orlofsky, J. L. (1990). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations, gender identity, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T. J., Connor, J. M., & Colletti, G. (1987). Gender-based schematic processing. An empirical investigation and reevaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 937–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. L. (1985). Personality: Current controversies, issues, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B. H., Leclerc, F., & Dubé-Rioux, L. (1988). Sex typing and consumer behavior: A test of gender schema theory. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, J. F. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, J. F., & McGrath, M. A. (1989). Unpacking the holiday presence: A comparative enthnography of two gift stores. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interceptive consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationship with sex role attitudes and behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment of Bem's gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88, 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uleman, J. S., & Weston, M. (1986). Does the BSRI inventory sex roles? Sex Roles, 15, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, C. E. (1988). The construction and validation of a measure of self-perception of sex-linked abilities. Unpublished master's thesis, Rutgers University, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Hormuth, S. E. (1981). On the function of the self: A reply to Hull and Levy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1029–1037.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Order of author listing was determined alphabetically, not by contribution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, S.J., Weil, C.E. Gift-giving roles and gender self-concepts. Sex Roles 24, 617–637 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288418

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288418

Keywords

Navigation