Abstract
This study investigated the subordinate liking and the leadership style of male and female managers in a simulated business activity. Sixty-seven female and 290 male undergraduate and graduate business students participated in this study. Female managers, on average, were not less well liked, nor were they more accommodative than male managers. Among managers classified as distinctly accommodative, females were not better liked than males; among managers classified as distinctly directive, females were significantly better liked than males. Under pressure to act in a directive manner, males tended to make use of their secondary leadership style as defined by F. E. Fiedler (1972), while females did not.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barter, A. The status of women in school administration. Educational Horizons, 1959, 37 (Spring), 72–75.
Bartol, K. M. Male and female leaders in small work groups. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University Business Studies, 1973.
Bartol, K. M., & Butterfield, D. A. Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 446–454.
Bock, R. D. Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Cohen, E., & Burns, P. SPSS-MANOVA multivariate analysis of variance and covariance (preliminary ed.). (Document No. 413.) Evanston, Ill.: Vogelback Computing Center, Northwestern University, May 1976.
Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 520–530.
Fiedler, F. E. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Fiedler, F. E. Personality, motivational systems, and behavior of high and low LPC persons. Human Relations, 1972, 25, 319–412.
Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. Leadership and effective management. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1974.
Ilgen, D. R., & Fujii, D. S. An investigation of the validity of leader behavior descriptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 642–651.
Kravetz, D. F. Sex role concepts of women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 437–443.
Lawrence, P. R., & Seiler, J. A. Vacation policy exercise. In the teachers' manual for Organizational behavior and administration (rev. ed.). Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1975.
Maier, N. R. F. Male versus female discussion leaders. Personnel Psychology, 1970, 23, 455–561.
Mason, K. O., Czajka, J. L., & Arber, S. Change in U.S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964–1974. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 573–596.
Merkel, M. E. Profile of the professional personnel woman. Personnel Journal, 1963, 42, 121–124.
Petty, M. M., & Miles, R. H. Leader sex-role stereotyping in a female-dominated work culture. Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 393–404.
Reskin, B. F. Sex differences in status attainment in science: The case of the postdoctoral fellowship. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 597–612.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 44–48.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 9–14.
Schein, V. E. The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95–100.
Schein, V. E. Relationships between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 340–344.
Tremain, D. J., & Terrell, K. Sex and the process of status attainment. American Sociological Review, 1975, 40, 174–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnett, M.D., Higgins, R.B. & Priem, A.P. Sex and least preferred co-worker score effects in leadership behavior. Sex Roles 6, 139–152 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288368
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288368