Sex Roles

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 113–127 | Cite as

Sex and sycophancy: Communication strategies for ascendance in same-sex and mixed-sex superior-subordinate dyads

  • Lyle Sussman
  • Terry A. Pickett
  • Irene Anchini Berzinski
  • Frederick W. Pearce

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine communication strategies for ascendance in same-sex and mixed-sex superior-subordinate dyads. The strategies, operationalized in terms of task and social facilitation, were derived from Bales' Interaction Process Analysis categories. Corollary data were collected relative to the subordinate's expected job satisfaction under male versus female supervision. Results indicated that (1) the perceived importance of task versus social facilitative strategies varied both within and across the four types of dyads, and (2) female subordinates expected to be more satisfied working under female supervision than did male subordinates.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athanassiades, J. C. An investigation of some communication patterns of female subordinates in hierarchical organizations. Human Relations, 1974, 27, 195–209.Google Scholar
  2. Athanassiades, J. C. The distortion of upward communication in hierarchical organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1973, 16, 207–226.Google Scholar
  3. Bales, R. F. Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B. M. Organizational life in the 70's and beyond. Personal Psychology, 1972, 25, 19–30.Google Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M., Krusell, J., & Alexander, R. A. Male managers' attitudes toward working women. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971, 15, 221–236.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 241–255.Google Scholar
  7. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. Interpersonal attraction. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, G. W., Worthy, N. B., & Greyser, S. A. Problems in review: Are women executives people? Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43, 52–67.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, D. T. Systematic error on the part of human links in communication systems. Information and Control, 1958, 1, 334–369.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, A. R. Upward communication in experimentally created hierarchies. Human Relations, 1958, 11, 41–53.Google Scholar
  11. Kelley, H. N. Communication in experimentally created Hierarchies. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 39–56.Google Scholar
  12. O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Roberts, K. A. Information filtration in organizations: Three experiments. Organizational behavior and human performance, 1974, 11.Google Scholar
  13. Orth, C. D., & Jacobs, F. Women in management: Pattern for change. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49, 139.Google Scholar
  14. Read, W. H. Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 1962, 15, 3–15.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts, K. A., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 205–215.Google Scholar
  16. Schein, V. E. The relationship between sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95–100.Google Scholar
  17. Schwartz, E. B. The sex barrier in business. Atlanta: Georgia State University, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lyle Sussman
    • 1
  • Terry A. Pickett
    • 2
  • Irene Anchini Berzinski
    • 2
  • Frederick W. Pearce
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of LouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Speech and Theatre ArtsUniversity of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations