Sex Roles

, Volume 24, Issue 5–6, pp 291–307 | Cite as

Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs

  • Judith S. Bridges


The sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs which are differentially applied to date and stranger rape were assessed. A sample of 62 college females and 33 males read one of three rape scenarios which varied according to the victim-perpetrator relationship (steady dating partners/acquaintances on a first date/strangers). Then participants rated the extent to which several sex role expectations and rape-supportive attitudes were applicable to the assault. MANOVAS and univariate ANOVAS showed that females' and males' perceptions of date rape, more than stranger rape, incorporated sex role expectations and that rape-supportive beliefs, primarily of males, were stronger in relation to steady date than first date or stranger rape. These findings are discussed in the context of the sex role analysis of rape.


Social Psychology College Female Role Expectation Univariate ANOVAS Date Rape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.Google Scholar
  2. Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173–194.Google Scholar
  3. Abbey, A., & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perception of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283–298.Google Scholar
  4. Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1984). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.Google Scholar
  8. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.Google Scholar
  9. Cherry, F. (1983). Gender roles and sexual violence. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.). Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
  11. Costin, F., Kibler, K. J., & Crank, C. (1982, August). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.Google Scholar
  13. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75.Google Scholar
  14. Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1041–1059.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, E. R., Howard, J. A., & Boezio, S. L. (1986). Tolerance of rape: A sexist or antisocial attitude? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 101–118.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–898.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, B. L., & Burt, M. R. (1986, August). Effects of familiarity with the rapist on postrape recovery. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212.Google Scholar
  19. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
  20. Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.Google Scholar
  21. L'Armand, K. L., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.Google Scholar
  22. Luginbuhl, J., & Mullin, C. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.Google Scholar
  23. Matlin, M. W. (1987). The psychology of women. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  24. Mayerson, S. E., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The effects of rape myth pornography on women's attitudes and the mediating role of sex role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 17, 321–338.Google Scholar
  25. McBroom, W. H. (1984). Changes in sex-role orientations: A five year longitudinal comparison. Sex Roles, 11, 583–592.Google Scholar
  26. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.Google Scholar
  27. Rabkin, J. G. (1979). The epidemiology of forcible rape. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 634–647.Google Scholar
  28. Ruch, L. O., & Chandler, S. M. (1983). Sexual assault trauma during the acute phrase: An exploratory model and multivariate analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 174–185.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitations: Rape, child sexual abuse and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–358.Google Scholar
  31. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  32. Worchel, S., Cooper, J., & Goethals, G. R. (1988). Understanding social psychology. Chicago: Dorsey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith S. Bridges
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Connecticut at HartfordWest Hartford

Personalised recommendations