Abstract
The impact of gender and marital status on migration decision making and satisfaction with the relocation decision six months following the move, are examined. Previous research in the literature concerning gender role, quality of life, and environmental sociology provides the conceptual framework for the following hypotheses: (a) women are more likely to migrate for quality-of-life, rather than economic, reasons; (b) single migrants are more likely to experience satisfaction with the move than are couples; (c) among couples, satisfaction with the move will be greatest when the decision to move is an egalitarian one; and (d) migrants who relocate for economic reasons will be dissatisfied with the move if their economic aspirations are not satisfied. Data are from the first interview with a random probability sample of 390 recent migrants into the Gallatin Valley of Montana. The sample was identified through new telephone listings, and a combined questionnaire/interview format was employed. Log-linear analyses were utilized to test the hypothesized relationships between marital status, the migration decision-making process, subsequent satisfaction with the decision to move, and income change as a result of the move. Hypotheses (a) and (b) above were supported. The data did not support the hypothesized relationship between egalitarian decision making and subsequent family satisfaction with the move. There also was no support for the expectation that migrants seeking economic goals would experience lower levels of satisfaction if these economic aspirations were unmet. The implications of these findings are discussed and alternative hypotheses are suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum, 1976.
Blackwood, L. G., & Carpenter, E. H. The importance of anti-urbanism in determining residential preferences and migration patterns. Rural Sociology, 1978, 43(1), 31–47.
Brody, C. J. Differences by sex in support of nuclear power. Social Forces, 1984, 63(1), 209–228.
Brown, D. L., & Wardwell, J. M. (Eds.). New directions in urban-rural migration. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. L. The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage, 1976.
Christenson, J. A. Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: Testing the spatial and communal hypothesis. Social Forces, 1984, 63(1), 160–168.
Clark, G. L. Interregional migration, national policy and social justice. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld, 1983.
Davis, J. A. Hierarchiacal models for significance tests in multivariate contingency tables. In H. L. Costner (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1973–1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
Fernandez, R. R., & Dillman, D. A. The influence of social attachment of geographic mobility. Rural Sociology, 1979, 44(2), 345–360.
Forsythe, D. A. Urban incomes and rural changes. Sociological Ruralis, 1980, 20(4), 287–296.
Gilbert, G. N. Modelling society: An introduction to loglinear analysis for social researchers. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Greenwood, M. J. Migration and economic growth in the United States. New York: Academic Press, 1983.
Karp, H. H., & Kelly, K. D. Toward an ecological analysis of intermetropolitan migration. Chicago: Markham, 1983.
Kennedy, J. J. Analyzing qualitative data. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1983.
Lee, E. S. A theory of migration. Demography, 1966, 3(2), 47–57.
Leslie, G. R., & Richardson, A. H. Life cycle, career patterns and decision to move. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26(3), 894–902.
Marini, M. M. Sex differences in occupational aspirations and expectations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, 1976.
McStay, J. R., & Dunlap, R. E. Male-female differences in concern for environmental quality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1983, 6(4), 291–301.
Ploch, L. R., & Cook, C. M. Turn around migration and theoretical perspectives. The Rural Sociologist, 1982, 2(1), 36–44.
Ravenstein, E. G. The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1885, 48(2), 167–277.
Ridgeway, C. L. Predicting college women's aspirations from evaluations of the housewife and work role. The Sociological Quarterly, 1978, 19(2), 281–291.
Rossi, A. S. Gender and parenthood. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49(1), 1–19.
Schwarzweller, H. K. Migration and the changing rural scene. Rural Sociology, 1979, 44(1), 7–23.
Sell, R. R. Analyzing migration decisions: The first step — Whose decisions? Demography, 1983, 20(3), 299–311.
Speare, A. Jr., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. Residential mobility, migration and metropolitan change. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1974.
Stevens, J. Objective indicators, personal characteristics and satisfaction with safety from crime and violence: An interaction model. Social Indicators Research, forthcoming.
Stockard, J., & Dougherty, M. Variations in subjective culture: A comparison of females and males in three settings. Sex Roles, 1983, 9(9), 953–974.
Thomas, W. I. Sex and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1907.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970 Census of population: General social and economic characteristics. Final report PC(1)-C28, Montana, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1971.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Geographical mobility: March 1975 to March 1980. Current Population Reports, 1981, P-20,368.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1980 census of population: General social and economic characteristics. Final report PC(1)-C28. Montana, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1983.
Varady, D. P. Motivations of residential mobility decision. AOA Journal, 1983, 42(2) 184–199.
Williams, J. D. Turnaround migrants: Grubby economics or delightful indulgence in ruralism? The Rural Sociologist, 1982, 2(2), 104–108.
Williams, J. D., & Sofranko, A. J. Motivations for the immigrant component of population turnaround in nonmetropolitan areas. Demography, 1979, 16(2), 237–246.
Zuiches, J. J. Residential preferences in migration theory. In D. Brown & J. Wardwell (Eds.), New directions in urban rural migration. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Partial support for the research described in this paper was provided by Montana Agricultural Experiment Station Project #473.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, A.S., Jobes, P.C. & Gilchrist, C.J. Gender roles, marital status, and urban-rural migration. Sex Roles 15, 627–643 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288219