Skip to main content
Log in

Masculinity and femininity: The role of desirability in the relationships among measures based on self-concept and personality traits

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With data gathered from 96 female college students, intercorrelations were examined among self-concept ratings of masculinity and femininity, and scales from two personality-trait measures of masculinity and femininity—the Adjective Check List (ACL) and the Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire (EPAQ). The sign and magnitude of the correlations between pairs of measures were successfully predicted on the basis of the congruence between measures of both the gender relevance and the desirability of the self-rated traits comprising each measure. The desirability of the trait items employed in self-report personality-trait scales of masculinity and femininity evidently introduces methods variance that can either inhibit or potentiate the relationship with other scales composed predominantly of either desirable or undesirable traits. When balanced for the desirability of trait items, personality-trait scores of masculinity and femininity were substantially inversely correlated with each other, and only marginally correlated with self-concept ratings of masculinity and femininity, but these correlations remained in the anticipated directions. This result is consistent with the findings of Pedhazur and Tetenbaum (“Bem Sex Role Inventory: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 996–1016), and supports Spence's (Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender-Related Traits: A Conceptual Analysis and Critique of Current Research,” In B. A. Maher and W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in Experimental Research, Vol. XIII, Normal Personality Processes, New York: Academic Press, 1984) position that personality traits should be viewed as only one of many possible referents for gender/sex role identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. The Adjective Check List Manual: 1983 Edition. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. K., & Spence, J. T. Desirable and undesirable masculine and feminine traits in counseling clients and unselected students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. The concept of identification. Psychological Review, 1958, 65, 296–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. The naive perception of masculinity-femininity on the basis of expressive cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 1978, 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. Psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, J. C. Personal Attributes Rating Scale (PARS). Unpublished scale, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Conn., 1979.

  • Schwarz, J. C. Do androgynous men and women have high self-esteem? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in Montreal, Canada, August 1980. Abstract published, (1980), Personality and Social Psychol. Bull. 6, No. 2, 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research, Vol. XIII, Normal personality processes. New York: Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, Tex. University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationship to self-report of neurotic and acting-out behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1673–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 43. (Ms. No. 617).

  • Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. O'Leary, R. Unger, & B. Wallston (Eds.), Sex, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. E., & Schwarz, J. C. Gender/sex-role identity in females: The influence of brother, sister, mother, and father. Submitted for publication, 1986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was sponsored in part by PHS Grant #R01 MH31750-01-6 and by funds from the University of Connecticut Research Foundation and Computer Center. The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Cynthia Wickless in collecting and coding the data on which this report is based.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarz, J.C., Williams, B.E. Masculinity and femininity: The role of desirability in the relationships among measures based on self-concept and personality traits. Sex Roles 15, 569–584 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288215

Keywords

Navigation