Abstract
Previous studies of receivers' responses to generic words have found that adults generally develop masculine imagery for neutral words and that men do this more than women. The present investigation of school-aged children (n=471) found that they, like adults, develop sex-specific masculine imagery in response to apparently neutral messages. Early adolescents, however, reported significantly more inclusive imagery than 6–7-year-olds. Different pronoun conditions elicited different mental imagery for the receivers of the messages with “he/she” eliciting more of a balance between male and female images and “they” eliciting more inclusive imagery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamsky, C. (1981). Changes in pronominal usages in a classroom situation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 5, 773–779.
Anttila, R. (1972). An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
Bate, B. (1975). Generic man, invisible woman: Language, thought, and social change. University of Michigan Papers in Women's Studies, 2, 83–95.
Bowers, J. W., & Courtwright, J. A. (1984). Communication research methods. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
Brooks, L. (1983). Sexist language in occupational information: Does it make a difference? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 227–232.
Eikenberry, P. M., & Keller, J. E. (1986). Can ‘he’ be gender-neutral: Moulton, Robison, and Elias revisited. Paper presented at Speech Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
Fisk, W. R. (1985). Responses to ‘neutral’ pronoun presentations and the development of sex-biased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21, 481–485.
Gelb, S. A. (1987). Generic pronouns in early childhood education: Were there female dinosaurs, too? Resources in Education, Document Number ED-285-673.
Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children's understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706.
Lindfors, J. W. (1980). Children's Language and Learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
Martyna, W. (1978). What does “he” mean? Use of the Masculine Genetic. Journal of Communication, 28, 131–138.
McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (Eds.). (1980). Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger.
Moulton, J., Robinson, G., & Elias, C. (1978, November). Sex bias in language use: ‘Neutral’ pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.
Oksaar, E. (1983). Language acquisition in the early years: An introduction to paedolinguistics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Richmond, V. P., & Gorham, J. (1988). Language patterns and gender role orientation among students in grades K-12. Communication Education, 37, 142–149.
Schau, C. G., & Scott, K. P. (1984). Impact of gender characteristics of instructional materials: An integration of the research literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 183–193.
Schneider, J., & Hacker, S. (1973). Sex role imagery and the use of generic ‘man’ in introductory texts. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
Todd-Mancillas, W. R. (1981). Masculine generics = sexist language: A review of literature and implications for speech communication professionals. Communication Quarterly, 29, 107–115.
Vetterling-Braggin, M., Ellinston, F. A., & English, J. (1981). Feminism and philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Williams, J. E., Bennett, S., & Best, D. (1975). Awareness and expression of sex stereotypes in young children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 635–642.
Wise, E., & Rafferty, J. (1982). Sex bias and language. Sex Roles, 8, 1189–1196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Indiana University—Purdue University at Fort Wayne Research and Instructional Development Support Program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Switzer, J.Y. The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles 22, 69–82 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288155
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288155