Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 9–10, pp 993–1007 | Cite as

Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men?

  • Mary Glenn Wiley
  • Arlene Eskilson

Abstract

This study tests competing socialization- and identity-based hypotheses concerning the impact of variations in speech style (powerful/powerless) on perceptions of male and female managerial job applicants. In addition, we investigate the effect of the gender of the observer on sensitivity to variation in speech style. Supportive of the socialization hypothesis, speech style has a significant effect on expectations of “success” and “acceptance” in a managerial position, as well as on attributions of situationally relevant traits regardless of the gender of the applicant. However, the identity perspective is supported by the finding that gender of the applicant affects perceptions of “liking” and attributions of gender-linked traits. We argue that the relevance of evaluative dimensions and traits for a particular context affects the impact of gender on the interpretation of actions. As predicted, female observers were more sensitive to variations in speech style. In fact, the effects of speech style on evaluations of applicants disappeared when only male responses were considered. The implications of these findings for equal opportunity in hiring and promotion are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C. N., & Wiley, M. G. Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: A sociological perspective. New York: Basic Books, 1981. Pp. 269–289.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. The psychology of interpersonal behavior. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, J., Conner, B. P., Zelditch, M. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 241–255.Google Scholar
  5. Berryman-Fink, C. L., & Wilcox, J. R. A multivariate investigation of perceptual attributions concerning gender appropriateness in language. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 663–681.Google Scholar
  6. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
  7. Buck, R. Nonverbal communication of affect in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 644–653.Google Scholar
  8. Buck, R., Savin, V., Miller, R., & Caul, W. Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 362–371.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, S. L., & Bunker, K. A. Subtle effects of sex-role stereotypes of recruiter's hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 566–572.Google Scholar
  10. Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 261–262.Google Scholar
  11. Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. Relative importance of sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 39–43.Google Scholar
  12. Gitter, A. G., Black, H., & Mostofsky, D. Race and sex in communication of emotion. Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 88, 273–276.Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg, P. Are women prejudiced against women? Trans-action, 1968, 5, 28–30.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, J. L., & Frederickson, W. A. Sex-role stereotyping, a function of age and education as measured by a perceptual-projective device. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 77–84.Google Scholar
  15. Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. The managerial woman. New York: Doubleday, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. Krammer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, 1974, 8, 82–85. (a)Google Scholar
  17. Krammer, C. Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14–24. (b)Google Scholar
  18. Krammer, C. Female and male perception of female and male speech. Paper presented at the 70th annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  20. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  21. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 267–276.Google Scholar
  22. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Pheterson, G. I., Kiesler, S. B., & Goldberg, P. A. Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 114–118.Google Scholar
  24. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. The “good manager”: Masculine or androgynous? Management Journal, 1979, 22, 395–403.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, L. W. The dynamics of sex and gender. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.Google Scholar
  26. Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 9–14. (a)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosen, B., & Jardee, T. H. Effects of applicant's sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 511–512. (b)Google Scholar
  28. Schein, V. E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95–100.Google Scholar
  29. Schein, V. Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 43, 220–236.Google Scholar
  30. Slevin, K. E., & Wingrove, C. R. Similarities and differences among three generations of women in attitudes toward the female role in contemporary society. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 609–624.Google Scholar
  31. Zuckerman, M., Lipets, M., Koivumaki, J., & Rosenthal, R. Encoding and decoding nonverbal cues of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 1068–1076.Google Scholar
  32. Zurckerman, M., Hall, J., DeFrank, R., & Rosenthal, R. Encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed facial expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 966–977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Glenn Wiley
    • 1
  • Arlene Eskilson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Illinois at ChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Lake Forest CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations