Abstract
Rape is an underreported and underconvicted crime. Therefore, many highly sexually aggressive men are missed by research employing judicial identification for sample selection. The present study examined the psychological characteristics of three types of undetected sexually aggressive men who had assaulted female acquaintances. Subjects were selected on the basis of their responses to the Sexual Experiences Survey and completed questionnaires that reflected psychological variables relevant to two major theoretical models of rape, the psychopathology model and the social control/social conflict model. Data were analyzed via discriminant analysis. The groups were significantly discriminated by seven variables, including six rape-supportive attitudes. The findings support a social control/social conflict explanation of nonstranger sexual aggression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amir, M. Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
Brownmiller, S. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975.
Burt, M. R. Attitudes supportive of rape in American culture. In House Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Domestic and International Scientific Planning, Analysis, and Cooperation, Research into Violent Behavior: Sexual Assaults (Hearing, 95th Congress, 2nd Session, January 10–12, 1978). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978). Pp. 277–322.
Burt, M. R. Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 217–230.
Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 1957, 21, 343–349.
Clark, L., & Lewis, D. Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: Women's Press, 1977.
Deming, M. P., & Eppy, A. The sociology of rape. Sociology and Social Research, 1981, 65, 357–380.
Feild, H. S. Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 156–179.
Glaser, D. Crime in our changing society. New York: Holt, Winston, 1978.
Groth, A. N., & Birnbaum, H. J. Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum, 1979.
Hare, R. D. Psychopathy: The theory and research. New York: Wiley, 1970.
Klecka, W. R. Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. The Sexual experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982, 50, 455–457.
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. Criminal victimization surveys in 13 American cities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. Forcible rape: A National study of response by prosecutors. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
Malamuth, N. M. Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 1981, 37, 138–157.
Malamuth, N. H., & Check, J. V. P. Sexual arousal to rape depictions. Journal of Abnormal psychology, 1983, 92, 55–67.
Predue, W. C., & Lester, D. Personality characteristics of rapists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 35, 514.
Rabkin, J. G. The epidemiology of forcible rape. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1979, 49, 634–647.
Rader, C. M. MMPI profile types of exposers, rapists, and assaulters in a court services population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 61–69.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973, 2, 219–220.
Tieger, T. Self-rated likelihood of raping and social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 1981, 15, 147–158.
Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 1973, 8, 71–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant Number MH31618 from the National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape. The authors gratefully acknowledge the statistical assistance of Linda Elman and Chris Gidycz as well as comments on earlier drafts by Michele Paludi and Stuart Taylor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koss, M.P., Leonard, K.E., Beezley, D.A. et al. Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles 12, 981–992 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288099
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288099