Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 9–10, pp 955–964 | Cite as

Infant clothing: Sex labeling for strangers

  • Madeline Shakin
  • Debra Shakin
  • Sarah Hall Sternglanz
Article

Abstract

Labeling an infant as a boy or girl affects behavior toward the infant. While intimates know a baby's sex label and behave consistently to the baby, strangers cannot unless given a cue. Forty-eight infants and their caretakers were observed in suburban malls to see if clothing normally provides such cues; 90% of the infants were dressed in sex-typed clothes. Girls wore or carried pink (75%), yellow, ruffles, puffed sleeves, and/or dresses. Boys wore blue (79%) and/or red. Observers were able to correctly guess the sex of “labeled” infants only. Surprisingly, simultaneous caretaker interviews revealed that parents do not spontaneously mention sex as a factor in clothing choice, nor do they feel they would be very bothered by strangers' mistaking the infant's sex.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, J., & Lewis, M. Attachment behaviors in thirteen-month-old, opposite-sex twins. Child Development, 1974, 45, 243–247.Google Scholar
  2. Condry, S. M., Condry, J. C., Jr., & Pogatshnik, L. W. Sex differences: A study of the ear of the beholder. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 697–704.Google Scholar
  3. Culp, R. E., Cook, A. S., & Housley, P. C. A comparison of observed and reported adultinfant interactions: Effects of perceived sex. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 475–479.Google Scholar
  4. Fagot, B. I. The influence of sex of child on parental reactions to toddler children. Child Development, 1978, 49, 459–465.Google Scholar
  5. Frisch, H. L. Sex stereotypes in adult-infant play. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1671–1675.Google Scholar
  6. Goldberg, S., & Lewis, M. Play behavior in the year-old infant: Early sex differences. Child Development, 1969, 40, 21–31.Google Scholar
  7. Haugh, S. S., Hoffman, C. D., & Cowan, G. The eye of the very young beholder: Sex typing of infants by young children. Child Development, 1980, 51, 598–600.Google Scholar
  8. Rothbart, M. K., & Maccoby, E. E. Parents' differential reactions to sons and daughters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 237–243.Google Scholar
  9. Rubin, J., Provenzano, F., & Luria, Z. The eye of the beholder: Parents' views on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1974, 44, 512–519.Google Scholar
  10. Seavey, C. A., Katz, P. A., & Zalk, S. R. Baby X: The effects of gender labels on adult responses to infants. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 103–109.Google Scholar
  11. Serbin, L. A., O'Leary, K. D., Kent, R. N., & Tonick, I. J. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behavior of boys and girls. Child Development, 1973, 44, 796–804.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, C., & Lloyd, B. Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant: Revisited. Child Development, 1978, 49, 1263–1265.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, K. E., & Barclay, L. K. Kindergarten children's descriptive sex-stereotyping of infants. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1979, 49, 514–517.Google Scholar
  14. Wallston, B. S., Devellis, B. M., & Wallston, K. Licensed practical nurses' sex role stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1983, 7, 199–208.Google Scholar
  15. Will, J. A., Self, P., & Datan, N. Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 46, 135–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madeline Shakin
    • 2
  • Debra Shakin
    • 1
  • Sarah Hall Sternglanz
    • 2
  1. 1.Albany Law SchoolUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentState University of New York at Stony BrookStony Brook

Personalised recommendations