Sex Roles

, Volume 20, Issue 11–12, pp 655–673 | Cite as

Effects of gender roles and self perceptions on affective reactions to horror films

  • Norbert Mundorf
  • James Weaver
  • Dolf Zillmann


Responses to graphic horror films have been shown to be modified by a number of personality variables, and in particular, by gender-specific rules for social conduct. In earlier horror research it has been assumed that gender-specific responses are largely determined by biological gender. More recent research has focused on psychological patterns of gender identity that often transcend biological gender lines. This investigation sought clarification by examining the impact of individuals' self-perceived gender role and other personality characteristics on affective responses to horror. Subjects' perceptions of how same- and opposite-gender peers would respond to such materials were also assessed. Consistent with theoretical expectations, the findings revealed strong effects on the estimation of opposite-gender target's reactions as a function of both the rater's gender role characteristics and biological gender. Other personality factors were found to influence responses to horror only marginally, however. The results are discussed in terms of the gender role socialization model of affect.


Gender Role Clarification Gender Identity Personality Factor Affective Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. All-Time Film Rental Champs (of the U.S.-Canada market). Variety, January 14, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, S. M., & Bem, S. L. Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 41, 74–86.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, B. A. The motion picture audience: A neglected aspect of film research. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), The film audience: An international bibliography of research with annotations and an essay. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, B. W., Brewer, B., Dickerson, B., & Magee, R. The influence of personal values on movie preference. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. Belk, S. S., & Snell, W. E., Jr. Beliefs about women: Components and correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 12, 403–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. Probing the promise of androgyny. In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Brown, Little, and Company, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. Bunnell, C. The gothic: A literary genre's transition to film. In B. K. Grant (Ed.), Planks of reason: Essays on the horror film. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. An inventory for assessing the different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21, 343–349.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, O. J. Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1961, 56, 52–64.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, E. The relationship between sensation-seeking and horror movie interest and attendance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Farber, J. Blood, sweat, and fears: Why are horror movies such a slashing success? Seventeen, July 1987, pp. 108–109, 140–141, 149.Google Scholar
  13. Frable, D. E. S., & Bem, S. L. If you are gender schematic, all member of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49, 459–468.Google Scholar
  14. Giles, D. Conditions of pleasure in horror cinema. In B. K. Grant (Ed.), Planks of reason: Essays on the horror film. Metuchen, NJ: the Scarecrow Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970, 65, 1582–1589.Google Scholar
  16. Lang, P. J. Anxiety questionnaires. In R. Aero & E. Weiner (Eds.), The mind test. New York: William Morrow, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P. Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Morawski, J. G. The troubled quest for masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18, 150–163.Google Scholar
  20. O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 97, 316–333.Google Scholar
  21. Roe, K., & Salomonsson, K. The uses and effects of video viewing among Swedish adolescents: An ethnographic study of adolescent video users. Media Panel Report No. 31, Lunds Universitet Sociologiska institutionen, Lund, Sweden, December 1983.Google Scholar
  22. Snyder, M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 526–537.Google Scholar
  23. Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2). New York: Random House, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. Tamborini, R., & Stiff, J. Predictors of horror film attendance and appeal: An analysis of the audience for frightening films. Communication Research, 1987, 14, 415–436.Google Scholar
  25. Tamborini, R., Stiff, J., & Zillmann, D. Preference for graphic horror featuring male versus female victimization: Personality and past film viewing experiences. Human Communication Research, 1987, 13, 529–552.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. Psychological androgyny: A review and reformulation of theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 92, 347–366.Google Scholar
  27. Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24, 479–486.Google Scholar
  28. Weaver, J. B., & Wakshlag, J. Perceptions of personal vulnerability to crime, criminal victimization experience, and television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 1986, 30, 141–158.Google Scholar
  29. Whitley, B. E. Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 765–778.Google Scholar
  30. Zillmann, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., & Aust, C. F. Effects of an opposite-gender companion's affect to horror on distress, delight, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 586–594.Google Scholar
  31. Zuckerman, M., & Litle, P. Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events. Personality and Individual Differences, 1986, 7, 49–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Mundorf
    • 1
  • James Weaver
    • 2
  • Dolf Zillmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Speech CommunicationUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston
  2. 2.University of KentuckyUSA
  3. 3.University of AlabamaUSA

Personalised recommendations