Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 63–74 | Cite as

Same- and cross-sex friendships and the psychology of homosociality

  • Suzanna M. Rose


The present study investigated the homosocial preferences and the functions, formation, and maintenance characteristics of same- and cross-sex friendships for a sample of 90 young adults, ages 20 to 28 years. Single women and married participants of both sexes evidenced a definite preference for same-sex friendships. The expectations associated with same-sex friendship functioning were found to be similar for both sexes. Cross-sex friendships were reported by both women and men as providing less help and loyalty than same-sex relationships. Otherwise, cross-sex friendship functioning was described by men as closely resembling same-sex friendships, but women reported cross-sex relations as providing less acceptance, less intimacy, and more companionship than same-sex ones. Friendship formation and maintenance for same- and cross-sex friendships were also found to differ significantly. The results are discussed in terms of Lipman-Blumen's [In M. Blaxall & B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976, pp. 15–32] theory of homosociality.


Young Adult Social Psychology Single Woman Maintenance Characteristic Definite Preference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bell, R. R. Friendships of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 402–417.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, J. Homosociality and female depression. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 213–238.Google Scholar
  3. Booth, A., & Hess, E. Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, February 1974, 38–47.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1982, 8(7), 721–732.Google Scholar
  5. Candy, S. G., Troll, L. E., & Levy, S. G. A development exploration of friendship functions in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 456–472.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, C. F. Woman's Place. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, J. L., & Narus, L. R. Sex roles and intimacy in same sex and other sex relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 444–455.Google Scholar
  8. Foa, U. Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 1971, 171, 345–351.Google Scholar
  9. Hacker, H. M. Blabbermouth and clams: Sex differences in self-disclosure in same-sex and cross-sex friendship dyads. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 385–401.Google Scholar
  10. Hess, E. Friendship. In M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, & A. Foner (Eds.), Aging and society, Vol. 3, New York: Russell Sage, 1972, pp. 357–383.Google Scholar
  11. Komarovsky, M. Blue collar marriage. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Larwood, L., & Wood, M. M. Women in management. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Lipman-Blumen, J. Toward a homosocial theory of sex roles: A explanation of the sex segregation of social institutions. M. M. Blaxall & B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
  14. Livesley, W. J., & Bromley, D. B. Person perception in childhood and adolescence. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Lopata, H. A. Occupation: Housewife. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Reagan, B., & Blaxall, M. Occupational segregation in International Women's Year. In M. Blaxall & B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the work place. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  17. Weiss, L., & Lowenthal, M. Life course perspectives on friendship. In M. Lowenthal, M. Thurnher, & D. Chiriboga (Eds.), Four stages of life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanna M. Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Missouri—St. LouisSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations