Abstract
Why has the position of the sexes become an issue in some social movements and not in others? Under what conditions has feminism emerged out of movements devoted to other causes? Starting with these general questions, this case study, based on participant observation, explores the factors which led women in the draft resistance movement in Boston in the late 1960s to turn toward, and help found, a Women's Liberation group. The strategies and tactics of the Resistance (more explicitly than other New Left movements) differentiated male from female participants. The segregation and subordination of women within the Resistance drew them into awareness of themselves as a distinct group; the Resistance ideology, which had strong egalitarian themes, contradicted their subordination and could be extended to define sexual inequality as a political issue. Contact with outside feminists helped precipitate the shift from draft resistance to Women's Liberation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Bell, I. P. CORE and the strategy of nonviolence. New York: Random House, 1968.
Boime, J. P. Lectures at Brandeis University and personal communication, 1968–70.
Boskey, J. Women draft disrupters explain action. Guardian September 6, 1969, p. 6.
Chodorow, N. Being and doing: a cross-cultural examination of socialization of males and females. In V. Gornick & B. K. Moran (Eds.), Woman in sexist society. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Cornell, T. The war and the draft: an overview. Christianity and Crisis 1969, 29 334.
Ferber, M., & Lynd, S. The Resistance. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
Flexner, E. Century of struggle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.
Freeman, J. The origins of the women's liberation movement. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78 792–811.
Geertz, C. Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight. Daedalus 1972, 101 (Winter), 1–37.
Hole, J., & Levine, E. Rebirth of feminism. New York: Quadrangle Books, 1971.
Kanter, R. M. Commitment and social organization: a study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review 1968, 33 499–517.
Komisar, L. Violence and the masculine mystique. Washington Monthly 1970, 2 (Winter), 39–48.
Lofland, J. Doomsday cult. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
Marx, G. T., & Useem, M. Majority involvement in minority movements: civil rights, abolition, untouchability. Journal of Social Issues 1971, 27 (1), 81–104.
Mitchell, J. Woman's estate. New York: Random House, 1971.
Musu, A., & Saadi, Y. (Producers). Battle of Algiers 1966.
Piercy, M. The grand coolie damn. In R. Morgan (Ed.), Sisterhood is powerful. New York: Random House, 1970.
Rowbotham, S. Women, resistance and revolution. New York: Random House, 1972.
Sharp, G. The politics of nonviolent action. Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973.
Thomas, E. Women incendiaries. New York: George Braziller, 1966.
Thorne, B. Resisting the draft: an ethnography of the draft resistance movement (Doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International 1971, 37 2814-A. (University Microfilms No. 71-30, 154).
Tiger, L. Men in groups. New York: Random House, 1969.
Useem, M. Conscription, protest, and social conflict: the life and death of a draft resistance movement. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thorne, B. Women in the draft resistance movement. Sex Roles 1, 179–195 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288010
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288010
Keywords
- Liberation Group
- Social Psychology
- Distinct Group
- Female Participant
- Social Movement