Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship of self-monitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the feminist identity scale

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The feminist identity scale (FIS) has been used to assess level of feminist identity development in women. This study examined the relationship between dating behaviors and FIS level in college-aged students, as an attempt to further validate the FIS as a measure of the feminist identity concept. Dating behaviors displayed by women at different FIS levels were consistent with differing gender role behaviors hypothesized to accompany feminist identity development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of male-female relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, R. M. The psychosocial stages of liberation. Illinois Personnel and Guidance Association Quarterly, 1977, 63, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clincky, B. M., Golderger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory and self-schema theory compared: A comment on Markus, Crane, Bernstein, and Siladis “self-schemas and gender.” Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 1982, 43, 1192–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. L., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S. R. Sex role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W. E. The Thomas and Cross models of psychological negrescience: A review. Journal of Black Psychology, 1978, 5, 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, F. K., & Ashmore, R. D. Sex stereotypes throughout the life cycle. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), River of personality and social psychology, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLucia, J. L. Gender role identity and dating behavior. What is the relationship? Sex Roles, 1987, 17, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, D. The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. From passive acceptance to active committment: A model of feminist identity development for women. Counseling Psychologist, 1985, 13, 695–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, W. Why men are the way they are. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. Beauty bound. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Pratkanis, A. R. The self. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griscom, J. L. Sex, race, and class: Three dimensions of women's experience. Counseling Psychologist, 1979, 8, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V., & Liotti, G. A constructionist foundation for cognitive therapy. In M. Mahoney & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive and psychotherapy. New York: Plenum, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L. (Ed.). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Ashmore, R. D. Women and men in personal relationships. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relationships. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, R. Finding herself: pathways to identity development in women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. A. Gender identity: Development and consequences. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of male-female relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, K. S. The reflective judgment model: Characteristics, evidence, and measurement In R. A. Mines & K. S. Kitchener (Eds.), Cognitive development in young adults. New York: Praeger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knefelkamp, L. L., Widnick, C. C., & Stroud, B. Cognitive-development theory: A guide to counseling women. In L. Harmon, J. Birk, L. Fitzgerald, & M. Tanney (Eds.), Counseling women. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., & Jones, G. G. Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 689–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, S., & Wessler, R. Measuring ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M., Pryor, J. B., & Simpson, D. D. The organization of social information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. Forms of ethnical and intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O. Comparative conclusions: Toward a transtheoretical therapy. In J. O. Prochaska (Ed.), Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebecca, M., Hefner, R., & Oleshansky, B. A model of sex-role transcendence. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, K. M. Feminist identity development: Scale development and initial validation studies. Paper presented at the Association for Women in Psychology, Denver, CO, March 1987.

  • Rickard, K. M. The effect of feminist identity level on gender prejudice toward artists' illustrations. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1988. (a)

  • Rickard, K. M. Accepting reality: Coping with threatened loss of self through development of feminist identity. Manuscript in preparation, 1988. (b)

  • Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., & Polonko, K. A conceptual approach to explicit marital negotiation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaef, A. W. Women's reality: An emerging female system in a white male society. Minneapolis, MN: Winston, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L., & Libby, P. L. Men and women in role relationships. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relationships. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surrey, J. L. Self-in-relation: A theory of women's development. Work in progress, Stone Center in Developmental Services and Studies, Wellesley, MA, 1985.

  • Tetenbaum, T. J., Lighter, J., & Travis, M. The construct validation of an attitude working mothers scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1983, 8, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rickard, K.M. The relationship of self-monitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the feminist identity scale. Sex Roles 20, 213–226 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287993

Keywords

Navigation