Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to investigate the relationship of the self-esteem of female athletes and nonathletes to sex role type and sport type. The athletic group was comprised of 75 female collegiate athletes from eight sports and the nonathletic group consisted of a random sample of 75 female nonathletes. An assessment of self-esteem and sex role type was completed through administering to all subjects the short form of the (PRF) ANDRO Scale of Masculinity and Femininity, and the Interpersonal Disposition Inventory (IDI). On the basis of the results of the IDI, the subjects were categorized into four sex role types: androgynous, masculine, feminine, and undifferentiated. Based upon previous research, it was predicted that (1) athletes would exhibit higher self-esteem scores than nonathletes, (2) the self-esteem of androgynous individuals would be higher than other sex role types, (3) the self-esteem of feminine or undifferentiated individuals would be lower than other sex role types, (4) the self-esteem of female athletes in higher femininity status sports would be greater than those in lower femininity status sports, and (5) there would be a greater proportion of androgynous athletes and feminine nonathletes. The following significant results were found: nonathletes in the feminine sex role type were lower in self-esteem than all other groups; and there was a greater proportion of androgynous athletes and feminine nonathletes than expected by chance. There were no differences in self-esteem of athletes in higher femininity status vs lower femininity status sports. These findings were discussed relative to past research, and the potential impact of sport on the psychosocial development or selection of certain sex role types.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–743.
Bem, S. L., Martyne, W., & Watson, C. Sex-typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34(5), 1016–1023.
Berzins, J., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the personality research form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 126–138.
Birns, B. The emergence and socialization of sex differences in the earliest years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1976, 22, 229–254.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. R., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 59–78.
Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80(3), 389–407.
Cratty, B. J. Psychology in contemporary sport. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1983.
Eitzen, D. S., & Sage, G. H. Sociology of American sport. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co., 1978.
Griffin, P. S., What's a nice girl like you doing in a profession like this? Quest, 1973, 45, 96–101.
Harris, D. V. Personality in athletics. Sport Psychology Conference Proceedings, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1978.
Harris, D. V., & Jennings, S. E. Self-perception of female distance runners. In Paul Milvy (Ed.). The marathon: Physiological, medical, epidemiological, and psychological studies. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences, 1977.
Hart, M. M. (Ed.) (1978). Sport in the socio-cultural process. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co., 1978.
Heilbrun, A. B. An exploration of antecedents and attributes of androgynous and undifferentiated sex roles. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1978, 132, 97–107.
Helmreich, R., & Spence, J. T. Sex-roles and achievement. In R. W. Christina & D. M. Landers (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport (Vol. 2). Champaign, IL.: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1977.
Lunneborg, P. Stereotypic aspect in masculinity-feminity measurement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 113–116.
Malumphy, T. The college woman athlete — Questions and tentative answers. Quest Monograph, June 1970, 14, 18–27.
Myers, A. M., & Lips, H. M. Participation in competitive amateur sports as a function of psychological androgyny. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 571–588.
Oglesby, C. A. (Ed.) (1978). Women and sport: From myth to reality. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1978.
Parson, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interactive process. New York: Free Press, 1955.
Rohrbaugh, J. B. Femininity on the line. Psychology Today, 1979, 30–42.
Scott, J. Men and women in sport: The manhood myth. In G. H. McGlynn (Ed.), Issues of physical education and sport. Palo Alto, Calif.: National Press Books, 1974.
Sherrif, M. C. The status of females athletes as viewed by selected peers and parents in certain high schools of central California. Unpublished master's thesis, Chico State College, 1969.
Snyder, E. E., & Kivlin, J. E. Women athletes and aspects of psychological well-being and body image. Research Quarterly, 1975, 46(27).
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Likability, sex-role congruence of interest and competence: It all depends on how you ask. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5(2) 93–109.
Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, E.G., Durborow, B. & Progen, J.L. Self-esteem of female athletes and nonathletes relative to sex role type and sport type. Sex Roles 15, 379–390 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287979
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287979