Abstract
In order to examine the role-modeling patterns of female athletes, 94 high school and 71 college basketball players were surveyed regarding (a) which player they most emulated, (b) perceptions regarding male vs. female coaches as role models, and (c) preferred gender of coach. High school subjects showed a greater tendency to emulate another player, and the significant majority of player role models were female. High school subjects who perceived a difference considered female coaches to be superior role models, and the 52% with a preference favored a female coach. However, the college subjects who perceived a difference, regarded male coaches as better examples of what they wanted to be and the 42% with a preference favored a male coach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acosta, V. R., & Carpenter, L. J. Women in athletics—A status report. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, August 1985, pp. 30–34.
Auchincloss, E. S., Harris, D. V., & Oglesby, C. A. (Eds.), The new agenda—A blueprint for the future of women's sports. San Francisco, CA: Women's Sports Foundation, 1984.
Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
Brophy, J. E. Child development and socialization. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, 1977.
Colorado Department of Education. Sports need you—Educators for athletic equality. Denver, CO: Title IX Sex Equity Program Publication, 1984.
Greendorfer, S. L. Role of socializing agents in female sport involvement. Research Quarterly, 1977, 48, 304–310.
Greendorfer, S. L. Socialization into sport. In C. A. Oglesby (Ed.), Women in sport—From myth to reality. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1978.
Hart, B. A., Hasbrook, C. A., & Mathes, S. A. An examination of the reduction in the number of female interscholastic coaches. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1986, pp. 68–77.
Heide, W. S. Feminism for a sporting future. In C. A. Oglesby (Ed.), Women in sport—From myth to reality. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1978.
Kenyon, G. S., & McPherson, B. D. Becoming involved in physical activity and sport: A process of socialization. In J. W. Loy, G. S. Kenyon, & B. D. McPherson (Eds.), Sport, culture, and society: A reader in the sociology of sport, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1981.
National Association for Girls and Women in Sport. Urgent action needed — Women in sport: An endangered species. GWS News, 1985, 13(2), 1.
Officer, S. A., & Rosenfeld, L. B. Self-disclosure to male and female coaches by female high school athletes. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1985, 7, 360–370.
Parkhouse, B. L., & Williams, J. M. Differential effects of sex and status on evaluation of coaching ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1986, 57, 53–59.
Rotter, J. Clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
Sisley, B. L., & Capel, S. A. High school coaching filled with gender differences. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, March 1986, pp. 39–43.
Weinberg, R., Reveles, M., & Jackson, A. Attitudes of male and female athletes toward male and female coaches. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1984, 6, 448–453.
Weiss, M. R., & Knoppers, A. The influence of socializing agents on female collegiate volley-ball players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1982, 4, 267–279.
Williams, J. M., & Parkhouse, B. L. Influence of coaching role models on sex bias and athletic aspirations. Research poster presentation, North American Society for Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity Conference, Gulf Park, MS, May 1985.
Women's Sports Foundation. Women and sport: The new agenda. Confirmed Conference Resolutions, January 1984, pp. 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitaker, G., Molstad, S. Role modeling and female athletes. Sex Roles 18, 555–566 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287960
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287960