Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting the division of labor in households

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports on the division of household labor in 108 Australian married-couple households and the factors which affect it. The data confirm the persistence of a very segregated division of household labor within Australian families and thus support L. Bryson's (“Thirty Years of Research on the Division of Labor in Australian Families,” Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage & Family, 1983, 4, 125–132) claim that the situation has changed very little in the last few decades. Nevertheless, some couples had moved toward more egalitarian arrangements, with the husband and wife sharing the majority of tasks. Performance of masculine household tasks is not predicted by many of the variables included in the study, with those most highly related being of an ideological nature (political orientation and egalitarianism) or personality variables (masculinity and femininity). Feminine household tasks, though, are done increasingly more often by women as time progresses in terms of age of parents, length of marriage, and number and ages of the children. These results may indicate true changes over time and/or cohort effects. Countering this trend toward greater traditionalism over time are factors that represent peoples' ideas or exposure to ideas, such as educational level achieved, whether currently receiving education, a Labor party political orientation (i.e., less conservative), and egalitarian attitudes. Occupational variables have less association than expected, and while males' income and hours worked mitigate against them participating in feminine areas of housework, women's work hours have no impact. The results for the number of shared tasks reflect those for the feminine tasks, such that as the feminine tasks are done relatively more often by women than by men, there is less sharing of tasks. The validity of measures of household task performance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antill, J. K., & Cotton, S. Spanier's Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Some confirmatory analyses. Australian Psychologist, 1982, 17, 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antill, J. K., & Russell, G. A preliminary comparison between two forms of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Australian Psychologist, 1980, 15, 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antill, J. K., & Russell, G. The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Method and sample comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1982, 34, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araji, S. K. Husbands' and wives' attitude-behavior congruence on family roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J., & Huston, T. L. Sex role orientation and division of labor early in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 330–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Burean of Statistics. Labor force status and other characteristics of families. Commonwealth Government Printer: Canberra, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. Labour force status and other characteristics of families. Commonwealth Government Printer: Canberra, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R. Significant roles among a sample of Australian women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 1975, 11, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S., & Lenney, E. Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. F., & Shih, A. Contributions to household labor: Comparing wives' and husbands' reports. In S. F. Berk (Ed.), Women and household labor. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. Husbands and wives. New York: Macmillan & Co., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. M., Cunningham, J. D., & Owen, J. Sex roles, self-esteem and the division of domestic labor in dual-career couples. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, 1982, 3, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, L. Thirty years of research on the division of labor in Australian families. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage & Family, 1983, 4, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A., Nye, F. I., & Gecas, V. Husbands' work involvement and marital role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1978, 40, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, A. A. Status and prestige in Australia: Studies in Australian society. Melborne: Cheshire, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S., & Sheley, J. F. Change in men's housework and child-care time, 1965–1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1986, 48, 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M. S. Marriage role expectations of adolescents. Marriage and Family Living, 1960, 22, 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, J. A., Yancey, W. L., & Ericksen, E. P. The division of family roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1979, 49, 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glezer, H. Changes in marriage and sex-role attitudes among young married women: 1971–1982. Paper presented at the Australian Family Research Conference, ANU, 1983.

  • Harper, J., & Richards, L. Mothers and working mothers. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Gibson, R. H. Sex-role attitudes: 1972–1980. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 656–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. M., & Fidell, L. S. Characteristics of androgynous, undifferentiated, masculine, and feminine middle-class women. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Robins, E. Conceptual and methodological issues in studying close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1982, 44, 901–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman-Boyden, P. G., & Abbott, M. Expectations for household task allocation and actual task allocation: A New Zealand study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1985, 47, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lein, L. Families without villains. Lexington Books, D. C. Health & Co., Lexington, MA.

  • Nyquist, L., Slivken, K., Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Household responsibilities in middle-class couples: The contribution of demographic and personality variables. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. Housewife. London: Penguin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. Husbands' paid work and family roles: Current research issues. In H. Z. Lopata & J. H. Pleck (Eds.), Research on the interweave of social roles. Vol. 3: Families and jobs. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Huber, J. Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: Marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 809–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. The father role and its relation to masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. Child Development, 1978, 49, 1174–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. The changing role of fathers. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, W. L., & Nye, F. I. Provider and housekeeper roles. In F. I. Nye (Ed.), Role structure and analysis of the family. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. A Short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973, 2, 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributions and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, R., Backman, E., & Dibona, P. The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a Macquarie University Research Grant and Grant A77/15244 to the first author from the Australian Research Grants Committee. Thanks are due to the 12 students who contributed their time to questionnaire design, data collection and coding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antill, J.K., Cotton, S. Factors affecting the division of labor in households. Sex Roles 18, 531–553 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287959

Keywords

Navigation