Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 7–8, pp 867–876 | Cite as

Women's communication in Mexican organizations

  • Betty Ann G. Korzenny
  • Felipe Korzenny
  • Gilda Sanchez de Rota

Abstract

This study attempts to derive a communication profile of women in Mexican organizations of the private sector. The questions that guided the study were the following: (1) Do women perceive their communication behaviors as similar to or different from those of men at their same organizational level? (2) If women do perceive differences, what is their nature? (3) Do perceived similarities to and differences from men vary by organizational level? Forty-five women in 14 Mexican organizations were intensively interviewed in the winter of 1980. The interviews were distributed equally at three organizational levels—secretarial, middle management, and upper management. It was found that women respondents perceive themselves to differ from men on 18 of 40 verbal and nonverbal communication variables. The average woman in this study perceived that verbally she is more courteous, cheerful, assertive, careful, likely to talk with males, self-confident, and directive than men, and that she expresses less agreement than men. Nonverbally, the average woman was found to look more at the eyes, smile more, give more attention to dress, be more punctual and flexible than men, and to be less rigid in posutre, touch less, invite co-workers to her home less, and take less work home. Organizational level differences were also found. The results are discussed in the light of the theoretical paradigms presented in the study.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alegria, J. A. Sociologia de las Mexicanas. Mexico, D.F.: Editorial Diana, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, A. J. La Mujer joven en Mexico. Mexico, D.F.: El Caballito, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, J. W., & Gritzmacher, K. J. Power in organizations: Male-female perspective. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Philadelphia, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology 1974, 42 155–162.Google Scholar
  5. Chodorow, N. Oedipal asymmetries and heterosexual knots. Social Problems 1976, 23 454–468.Google Scholar
  6. Deaux, K. The behavior of women and men. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks-Cole, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Fishman, P. Interaction, the work women do. Social Problems. April, 1978, pp. 397–406.Google Scholar
  8. Friedl, E. Women and men — an anthropologist's view. New York: Holt, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Henley, N. M. Body politics, power, sex, and non-verbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 197.Google Scholar
  10. Henley, N., & Thorne, B. Womanspeak and manspeak: Sex differences and sexism in communication, verbal and non-verbal. In A. G. Sargent (Ed.), Beyond sex roles. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. The Managerial woman. New York: Pocket Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Kanter, R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Kurchner-Hawkins, R. Women in management: A direction for communication research. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Acapulco, May 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Norton, R. W. Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research 1978, 4 99–112.Google Scholar
  16. Puhl, C. A. Latin American female-male communication: An overview. Paper presented at The International Communication Association Conference, Acapulco, May 1980.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, L. L. Women in management: Leadership theories, research results, and future directions. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Convention, St. Louis, Mo., April 1979.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, L., & McCallister, L. Situational effects of task and gender on non-verbal display. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Acapulco, May 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, L., & Skerchock, L. Verbal and non-verbal determinants of dominance in sex-type male, sex-type female and androgynous dyads. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, 1980.Google Scholar
  20. Rubin, G. Traffic in women: Notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Zaretsky, E. Capitalism, the family, and personal life. New York: Harper-Colophon, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Betty Ann G. Korzenny
  • Felipe Korzenny
    • 1
  • Gilda Sanchez de Rota
  1. 1.Department of Speech and Communication StudiesSan Francisco State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations