Abstract
Effects of sex and concern for equal employment opportunity on responses to mailed job applicant resumes were examined. Applicant sex and concern for equal employment opportunity were systematically varied to yield four different resumes for two functionally equivalent applicants. One of the four resumes of the applicants was sent to 200 corporations. Sex of the applicant was identified using a female name and initials (neutral designation). Interest in equal employment opportunity was manipulated using a thesis title involving sex discrimination and no thesis reported. Results indicated that both the number of replies and number of positive responses were influenced by the interaction of an applicant's sex and interest in sex discrimination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brehm, J. W. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
Brown, R. S., Moon, M., & Zoloth, B. S. Occupational attainment and segregation by sex, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 1980, 33 506–517.
Dipboye, R. L. Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60 39–43.
Epstein, C. F. Encountering the male establishment: Sex-status limits on women's careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology 1970, 75 965–982.
Hartwig, F., & Dearing, B. E. Exploratory data analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluation of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1979, 23 360–372.
Hitt, M. A., Zikmund, W. G., & Pickens, B. A. Discrimination in industrial employment: An investigation of race and sex bias among professionals. Work and Occupations 1982, 9 217–231.
Hope, K. Methods of multivariate analysis. London: University of London Press, 1968.
Landy, F. J., Bates, F. Another look at contrast effects in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology 1973, 58 141–144.
McIntyre, S., Moberg, D. J., & Posner, B. Z. Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal 1980, 23 738–749.
Newman, J. M. Discrimination in recruitment: An empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 1978, 32 15–23.
Newman, J. M., & Krzystofiak, F. Self-reports versus unobtrusive measures: Balancing method variance and ethical concerns in employment discrimination research. Journal of Applied Psychology 1979, 64 82–85.
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, R. A. Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review 1980, 5 267–276.
Siegel, S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Terborg, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13 352–376.
Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Zikmund, W. G., Hitt, M. A., & Pickens, B. A. Influence of sex and scholastic performance on reactions to job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63 252–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hitt, M.A., Zikmund, W.G. Forewarned is forearmed: Potential between and within sex discrimination. Sex Roles 12, 807–812 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287873