Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 8, Issue 8, pp 891–901 | Cite as

Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women

  • Michael Firth
Article

Abstract

The object of this study was to examine the extent of sex discrimination in the job market for accountants. The research design involved sending application letters to job advertisements appearing in the press. These letters came from males and females of varying race and marital backgrounds, although all had identical qualifications and work experience. The responses to these applications were then analyzed and formed the basis of the tests for discrimination. The results showed a significant level of discrimination against women and this was enhanced for those who were Colored, and/or those who were married and had children.

Keywords

Social Psychology Work Experience Research Design Identical Qualification Application Letter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buckley, J. E. Pay differences between men and women in the same job. Monthly Labor Review, 1971, 94(November), 36–39.Google Scholar
  2. Chiplin, B., & P. Sloane. Male-female earnings differences: A further analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1976, 14(March), 77–81.Google Scholar
  3. Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant résumés, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60(February), 39–43.Google Scholar
  4. Fidell, L. S. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1092–1098.Google Scholar
  5. Firth, M. A. Racial discrimination in the British labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1981, 34, (January), 265–272.Google Scholar
  6. Goldfarb, R. S., & Hosek, J. Explaining male-female wage differentials for the “same” job. Journal of Human Resources, 1976, 11(Winter), 98–109.Google Scholar
  7. Gwartney, J., & Stroup, A. Measurement of employment discrimination according to sex. Southern Economic Journal, 1973, 39(April), 575–587.Google Scholar
  8. Jowell, R., & Prescott-Clarke, P. Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race, 1970, 11(April), 397–417.Google Scholar
  9. Kerlinger, F. N. Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Labour Party, Discrimination against women. London: Labour Party, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. Mancke, R. B. Lower pay for women: A case of economic discrimination? Industrial Relations, 1971, 10(October), 316–326.Google Scholar
  12. McIntosh, N., & Smith, D. J. The extent of racial discrimination. P.E.P. Broadsheet, 1974, No. 547.Google Scholar
  13. Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82(March-April), 76–108.Google Scholar
  14. Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: Women's earnings re-examined. Journal of Human Resources, 1978, 13(Winter), 118–134.Google Scholar
  15. Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. Survey methods in social investigation (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, J. M. Discrimination in recruitment: An empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1978, 32(October), 15–23.Google Scholar
  17. Newman, J. M., & Krzystofiak, F. Self-reports versus unobtrusive measures: Balancing method variance and ethical concerns in employment discrimination research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(February), 82–85.Google Scholar
  18. Oppenheim, A. N. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement, London: Heinemann, 1966.Google Scholar
  19. Rendel, M. Equality for women. London: Fabian Society, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Rendel, M. Legislating for equal pay and opportunity for women in Britain. Signs, 1978, 3(Summer), 897–908.Google Scholar
  21. Rosen, B., Jerdee, T. H., & Prestwich, T. L. Dual-career marital adjustment: Potential effects of discriminatory managerial attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37(August), 565–572.Google Scholar
  22. Sandell, S. H., & Shapiro, D. The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: A re-examination of the evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 1978, 13(Winter), 103–117.Google Scholar
  23. Shaw, E. A. Differential impact of negative stereotyping in employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 333–338.Google Scholar
  24. Zikmund, W. G., Hitt, M. A., & Pickens, B. A. Influence of sex and scholastic performance on reactions to job applicant résumés. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63(April), 252–254.Google Scholar
  25. Zincone, L. H., Jr., & Close, F. A. Sex discrimination in a paramedical profession. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1978, 32(October), 74–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Firth
    • 1
  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations