Skip to main content
Log in

Social class and family size as determinants of attributed machismo, femininity, and family planning: A field study in two South American Communities

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major objective of the present investigation was to ascertain how stereotypes of machismo and femininity are related to acquired family size and perceptions of family planning. An indirect measurement approach was employed in which lower-class and upper-middle-class urban adults in Cali, Colombia, responded to photos of Colombian families which varied in size and completeness. The principal findings of the investigation revealed that (1) lower-class subjects described parents in the photos as significantly more macho and feminine because of their children than upper-middle-class subjects; (2) although no overall family size effect on attributions of machismo and femininity to parents emerged, lower-class female subjects described parents of large complete families as significantly more macho and feminine than parents of small complete families; (3) male subjects from both social classes described male spouses in the photos as more dominant and in greater control of the marital relationship as family size in the photos increased; and (4) perceptions of the incidence of family planning behaviors decreased linearly with family size for both social classes, although lower-class females attributed more family planning to spouses of large families than upper-middle-class females. Discussion of these results attempted to account for social class differences in the significance of parenthood as an indicator of sex-role identity and the psychological relevance of male dominance as a factor in fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back, K., & Hass, P. Family structure and fertility. In J. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1973, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Yates, F. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural, and medical research (3rd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, P. Population education in Colombia. Unpublished paper, 1970.

  • Hill, R., Stycos, J., & Back, K. The family and population control: A Puerto Rican experiment in social change. Chapel Hill, N. C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L., & Hoffman, M. The value of children to parents. In J. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1973, 19–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. Five families. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N. Marriage and family in middle-class Mexico. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1966, 28(August), 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, M., & Marnane, P. The differential evaluation of large and small families in rural Colombia: Implications for family planning. Social Biology, 1975, 22, 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patch, R. Attitudes toward sex, reproduction, and contraception in Bolivia and Peru. West Coast South American Series, 1970, 17(2).

  • Rainwater, L. And the poor get children. New York: Quadrangle Books, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. Family design. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Buj, S. Hispanoamérica y el machismo. Mundo Nuevo, April 1970, 28–32.

  • Simmons, A. Projective testing for ideal family size. In J. Stycos (Ed.), Ideology, faith, and planning in Latin America. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. Ambivalence toward small families in rural Latin America. Social Biology, 1974, 21, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stycos, J. Attitudes toward family size in Haiti. Human Organization, Spring 1964, 42–47.

  • Stycos, J. Human fertility in Latin America. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, O., & Campbell, D. Translating, working through interpreters and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Garden City, N. Y.: Natural History Press, 1970, 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, R. Role themes in Latin America. In G. Seward & R. Williamson (Eds.), Sex roles in changing society. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a predoctoral research fellowship from the Council of Intersocietal Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicassio, P.M. Social class and family size as determinants of attributed machismo, femininity, and family planning: A field study in two South American Communities. Sex Roles 3, 577–598 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287840

Keywords

Navigation