Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in response to physical and nonphysical instigators

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred and twenty subjects competed in a reaction-time task similar to that of Taylor (1967). Subjects were randomly assigned to a white noise, fine, or control condition. In the fine and noise conditions programmed “opponents” administered increasing provocation to subjects over a series of 24 trials. Control subjects were not provoked. As predicted, males retaliated with higher levels of noise than did females, while there were no sex differences in the fine condition. Contrary to prediction, sex of opponent had no effect. Subjects in all conditions tended to view the task as competitive but to devalue their opponent only in the noise condition. The prevalent assumption of female passivity in the face of instigation was rejected. Instead a dichotomy was proposed that while females are less likely than males to reciprocate to physical provocation, they are just as likely to respond to provocation of a nonphysical nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardwick, J. Psychology of women: A study of biocultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, J., & Sistrunk, F. Power, opportunity costs, and sex in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. C., & Buss, A. H. Effects of justification for aggression and communication with the victim on postaggression dissonance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. Instrumentality of aggression, feedback, and frustration as determinants of physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, S. Aggression. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, P. S., & Sheposh, J. Effects of incentive magnitude on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game: A reply to Gumpert, Deutsch, and Epstein. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. The psychology of behavior exchange. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, J. S., Ferguson, L. R., & Alpert, R. Mother—child interaction and the socialization process. Child Development, 1967, 38, 365–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., & Mechling, J. Betrayal and reconciliation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. S., Coleman, D., Forbes, J., & Johnson, R. Is the subject's personality or the experimental situation a better prediction of a subject's willingness to administer shock to a victim? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (Ed.). The development of sex differences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. Sex differences in children's aggression. Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972, 7, 93–94. (Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., Schmitt, D. R., & Shotola, R. Cooperation and interpersonal risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S., & Kleinke, C. Amount of reward as a variable in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 831–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, R. R., Rau, L., & Alpert, R. Identification and child rearing. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortell, J. R., & Biller, H. B. Aggression in children as a function of sex of subject and sex of opponent. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 3, 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. P. Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 1967, 35, 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. P., & Epstein, S. Aggression as a function of the interaction of the sex of the aggressor and the sex of the victim. Journal of Personality, 1967, 35, 474–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. P., & Smith, I. Aggression as a function of sex of victim and male subject's attitude toward women. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35, 1095–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T., Lesnick, S., & Gahagan, J. Feedback and “washout” effects in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Tyler, L. E. Psychological sex differences. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. P. A cross-cultural analysis of sex differences in the behavior of children aged three to eleven. Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 91, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, Z. I. The role of race, sex, hostility, and verbal stimulus in inflicting punishment. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 12, 285–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lando, H.A., Johnson-Payne, E., Gilbert, L.A. et al. Sex differences in response to physical and nonphysical instigators. Sex Roles 3, 523–535 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287836

Keywords

Navigation