Abstract
Women's sex-role perceptions and behavior were studied from the perspective of role theory, with an emphasis on examining the situational nature of female sex roles and the degree of consensus among women concerning female sex roles. The perceived appropriateness and expected outcome for sex-role characteristics and the actual enactment of masculine and feminine behaviors were examined for women in social and work situations. It was hypothesized that feminine behaviors prevail in social situations and masculine behaviors in work situations. This hypothesis was clearly supported for perceived appropriateness and actual behavior, but not for expected outcome. For this variable, the predicted pattern was found only in the social situation. It was also hypothesized that the degree of consensus across women is higher for feminine than for masculine characteristics, but this pattern was found only for perceived appropriateness and actual behavior in the social situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W. Patterns and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.
Angrist, S. The study of sex roles. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25(1), 215–232.
Argyle, M. The concepts of role and status, Sociological Review, 1952, 44(3), 39–52.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. Role theory: Concepts and research. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Coombs, G. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. Mathematical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
Cottrell, L. S. The adjustment of the individual to his age and sex roles. American Sociological Review, 1942, 7, 617–620.
Darley, S. Big-time careers for the little woman: A dual-role dilemma. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32(3), 85–97.
Goode, W. J. A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 383–396.
Jackson, J. A conceptual and measurement model for norms and roles. Pacific Sociological Review, 1966, 9, 35–47.
Levinson, D. J. Role, personality and social structure in the organizational setting. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 170–180.
Linton, R. The study of man. New York: Appleton Century, 1936.
Linton, R. The cultural background of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1947.
Morris, B. Reflections on role analysis. British Journal of Sociology, 1971, 22, 395–409.
Neiman, L. J., & Hughes, J. W. The problem of role — a resurvey of the literature. Social Forces, 1951, 30, 141–149.
Newcomb, T. M. Role behavior in the study of individual personality and of groups. Journal of Personality, 1949, 18, 273–289.
Parsons, T. Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 1942, 7, 604–616.
Rappaport, A. F., Payne, D., & Steinmann, A. Perceptual differences between married and single women for the concepts of self, ideal woman, and man's ideal woman. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970, 32, 441–442.
Warren, R. L. Culture, personal and situational roles. Sociology and Social Research, 1949, 34, 104–111.
Yockey, J. M. Sex role perceptions and behavior: An exchange theory analysis. Unpublished manuscript, California State College, Stanislaus, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a dissertation submitted to the University of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree. Portions of this work were presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in September 1976. The author would like to express her appreciation to Lawrence J. Severy and Marvin E. Shaw for their advice throughout this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yockey, J.M. Role theory and the female sex role. Sex Roles 4, 917–927 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287711
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287711