Abstract
The women's movement as a social movement with intentions to create social change has had a cyclical history of appearance and disappearance. At its periods of reemergence, “backlash” reactions also occur. This paper deals with the women's movement in this context. Using a social movement analysis, it considers the possibility of success in creating social change, given that powerful groups of women oppose it. There is a renewed interest in antifeminism since the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment. Questions that arise: (1) Why do some women become feminists and others antifeminist? (2) What are the characteristics of social movements and the backlash that would explain these differences and lead to possible reconciliation? The material that forms the empirical basis of this paper is drawn from 24 feminists and antifeminists in five countries who wrote according to a structured outline about their relationship to the women's movement. Contributors differed in background, age, race, sexual preference, and life-style. Through their stories the issues that both separate and unite women emerge—issues such as abortion, men, motherhood, and the family. Surprising similarities emerge between those supposedly on different “sides” of the fence, and it becomes evident that no clear dividing line does exist, but rather a complex interweaving of the issues, experiences, and difficulties of being “woman.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardwick, J. In transition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.
Dworkin, A. Right-wing women: The politics of domesticated females. London: The Women's Press, 1983. (a)
Dworkin, A. Antifeminism. Trivia: A Journal of Ideas 1983, Spring 6–35. (b)
Ehrenreich, B. The women's movements: Feminist and antifeminist. Radical America 1981, 15 93–101.
Firestone, S. The dialectic of sex: A case for feminist revolution. London: Paladin, 1972.
Friedan, B. The feminine mystique. U.S.A.: Penguin, 1963.
Gerlach, L., & Hine, V. People, power, change: Movements of social transformation. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs Merril, 1970.
Heberle, R. Social movement: An introduction to political sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951.
Rowland, R. Directions in sex role research: Past, present and future. Australian Psychologist 1980, 15 419–426.
Rowland, R. An exploratory study of the childfree lifestyle. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 1982, 18(1), 17–30.
Rowland, R. (Ed.), Women who do and women who don't, join the women's movement. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
Schlafly, P. The power of the positive woman. New York: Arlington House Press, 1977.
Sherif, C. W. Orientation in social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.
Sherif, M. Group conflict and co-operation: Their social Psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. An outline of social psychology. (Revised ed.) New York: Harper & Row, 1956.
Snyder, D., & Tilly, C. Hardship and collective violence in france, 1830–1950. American Sociological Review 1972, 37 520–532.
Spender, D. Women of ideas and what men have done to them. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982.
Toch, H. The social psychology of social movements. London: Menthuen, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowland, R. Women who do and women who don't, join the women's movement: Issues for conflict and collaboration. Sex Roles 14, 679–692 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287697
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287697