Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The second androgyny: A proposed revision in adaptive priorities for college women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence has accumulated suggesting that androgyny, as popularly conceived (i.e., balanced and flexible display of masculine and feminine behaviors across situations), has more adaptive value for women than for men and even that it holds less value than believed for women. Four sex types were compared in a series of studies bearing upon psychological adjustment in college women: (1) balanced androgyny, (2) blended androgyny that integrates masculinity and femininity, (3) femininity, and (4) masculinity. In three out of four studies that considered daily stress symptoms, Type A characteristics, and menstrual distress, balanced androgynes demonstrated the poorest psychological adaptation and blended androgynes the best. The fourth study considered the psychological characteristics associated with eating disorders and found feminine women to be the most maladapted. Interpretation of the trend of results in terms of identity problems for the balanced androgynous woman was offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Beyond androgyny: Some presumptuous prescriptions for a liberated sexual identity. In J. Sherman & F. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology of women: Future directions and research. New York: Psychological Dimensions, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 1961, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1961, 25, 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskind-Lodahl, M., & White, W. C., Jr. The definition and treatment of bulimarexia in college women — A pilot study. Journal of American College Health, 1978, 27, 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. P. Psychological androgyny. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen, A., & Kessel, N. Menstruation and personality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1963, 109, 711–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennerstein, L., Spence-Gardner, C., & Burrows, G. D. Mood and the menstrual cycle. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1984, 18, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. J., & Gilbert, L. A. Sex-role stereotypes: Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976, 23, 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duddle, M. An increase of anorexia nervosa in a university population. British Journal of Psychology, 1973, 123, 711–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. K., & Ondercin, P. Personality variables related to compulsive eating in college women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1981, 37, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. Childhood and society. New York: Norton, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, J. F., & Dusek, J. B. An investigation of the relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 984–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 1979, 9, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M., Olmstead, M. P., & Polivy, J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia and bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 1983, 2, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halmi, K. A., Falk, J. R., & Schwartz, E. Binge-eating and vomiting: A survey of a college population. Psychological Medicine, 1981, 11, 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R., Rebecca, M., & Oleshansky, B. Development of sex-role transcendence. Human Development, 1975, 18, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Measurement of masculine and feminine sex-role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Human sex-role behavior. New York: Pergamon, 1981. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Gender differences in the functional linkage between androgyny, social cognition, and competence. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 1981, 41, 1106–1118. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Sex-based models of androgyny: A further cognitive elaboration of competence differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. Androgynous as type and androgyny as behavior: Implications for gender schema in males and females. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., & Han, Y. Cost-effectiveness of college achievement by androgynous men and women. Psychological Reports, 1984, 55, 977–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., & Han, Y. Sex differences in the adaptive value of androgyny. Psychological Reports, 1986, 59, 1023–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., & Pitman, D. Testing some basic assumptions about psychological androgyny. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1979, 135, 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., & Renert, D. Type A behavior, cognitive defense, and stress. Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., Palchanis, N., & Friedberg, E. Self-report measurement of Type A behavior: Toward refinment and improved prediction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1986, 50, 525–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. D., Rosenman, R. H., & Zyzanski, S. J. Prediction of clinical coronary heart disease by a test for the coronary prone behavior pattern. New England Journal of Medicine, 1974, 23, 1271–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H., Chernovetz, M. E., & Hansson, R. D. The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. G. Clarifying the concept of androgyny: Implications for therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1979, 3, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., & Worell, J. New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1101–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., Caudill, M. S., Hathorn, S., & O'Brien, C. G. Socially undesirable sex-correlated characteristics: Implications for androgyny and adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1185–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., & Carmen, B. The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. Psychological perspectives on the Type A behavior pattern. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91, 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. J. Sex-typing and self-schemata effects on memory and response latency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 252–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. A typology of a menstrual distress questionnaire. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969, 103, 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. Conceptualizations of human environments. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 652–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. Menstrual Distress Questionnaire manual. Stanford, CA: Social Ecology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, K., Mann, D. W., & Bardwick, J. M. Androgyny and self-esteem in the upper middle class: A replication of Spence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 1168–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, L. Fully human. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. E. Women learn to sing the menstrual blues. Psychology Today, 1973, 7, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore, R. Women and weight: A normative discontent. In S. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender: Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman, R. H. The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In T. M. Dembroski, S. M. Weiss, J. L. Shields, S. G. Haynes, & M. Feinleib (Eds.), Coronary-prone behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. L. Sex differences in social competence among androgyne: The influence of sexrole blending nonverbal information processing and social cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, 1982.

  • Selye, H. The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. S. Psychological androgyny and stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher's “Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. Psychological androgyny and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emory University, USA

    Alfred B. Heilbrun Jr. & Constance M. Mulqueen

Authors
  1. Alfred B. Heilbrun Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Constance M. Mulqueen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heilbrun, A.B., Mulqueen, C.M. The second androgyny: A proposed revision in adaptive priorities for college women. Sex Roles 17, 187–207 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287625

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287625

Keywords

Search

Navigation