Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in graduate student ambition: Do men publish while women perish?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares men and women graduate students at one university and identifies conditions under which women students equal or surpass men in ambition. Men and women were broadly similar in background characteristics, though different in current family status. They studied different subjects, aimed for different degrees, and were concentrated in different years in the university. If women were to equal the most highly ambitious men on ambition to publish and engage in related behaviors, they had to aspire to a doctorate, survive past the second year of study, and have nontraditional attitudes toward women's role. The results are discussed in terms of differential “student careers” and barriers to the development of ambition in student women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angrist, S. The study of sex roles. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. Notes on the role of choice in the psychology of professional women. In R. J. Lifton (Ed.), The Woman in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 1960, 66, 32–40. (Reprinted in H. S. Becker, Sociological Work. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. Personal change in adult life. Sociometry, 1964, 27, 40–53. (Reprinted in H. S. Becker, Sociological Work. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., & Carper, J. The development of identification with an occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 1956, 61, 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. Academic women. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. R., & Vinacke, W. E. Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 1961, 24, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Opportunities for women in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, A. Faculty needs and resources in American higher education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 1972, 399, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on University Women. Women in the University of Chicago: Report of the Committee on University Women. Chicago: The University Senate, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. Great aspirations: The graduate school plans of America's college seniors. Chicago: Aldine, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbe, W. Student integration and departmental cohesiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1961.

  • Feldman, S. Impediment or stimulant? Marital status and graduate education. In J. Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. Escape from the doll's house: Women in graduate and professional school education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, E., & associates. Life styles of educated women. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. Measures of association for cross classification. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1954, 49, 732–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, G. C. The woman doctoral recipient: A study of the difficulties encountered in pursuing graduate degrees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1967.

  • Gropper, G., & Fitzpatrick, R. Who goes to graduate school? Pittsburgh: American Institute for Research, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. The second sex in academe. American Association of University Professors Bulletin, 1970, 65, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, E. I., & Holmstrom, R. W. The plight of the woman doctoral student. American Educational Research Journal, 1973, 11, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, L. The two-career family. Cambridge: Mass.: Schenkman, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M. Fail: Bright women. Psychology Today, 1969, 3, 36–38; 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. S. The academic and financial status of graduate students, spring 1965. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. Cultural contradictions and sex roles. American Journal of Sociology, 1946, 52, 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. Cultural contradictions and sex roles: The masculine case. In J. Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. Women's intellect. In S. Farber & R. Wilson (Eds.), The potential of women. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Schuessler, K., & Costner, H. Statistical reasoning in sociology (2nd ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M., & Sells, L. Women dropouts from higher education. In A. S. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds.), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloma, M. M. The myth of the egalitarian family: Familial roles and the professionally employed wife. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C., August, 1970.

  • Rossi, A. S. Barriers to the career choice of engineering, medicine, or science among American women. In J. Mattfield & C. Van Aken (Eds.), Women and the scientific professions. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S. The status of women in graduate departments of sociology, 1968–1969. American Sociologist, 1970, 5, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. Timetables. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P., & Lever, J. Women in the male world of higher education. In A. S. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds.), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. M. Education and employment: The early careers of college graduates. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S. Role innovation in occupational choice among college women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1969.

  • Turner, R. Some aspects of women's ambition. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi, T. K., & Vinacke, W. E. Strategy in a feminine game. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, E. L. Some factors in obtaining postgraduate education. Sociology of Education, 1969, 42, 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research upon which this paper is based was carried out with the assistance of a Lena Lake Forrest Fellowship from the Business and Professional Women's Foundation, Washington, D.C.

The author wishes to thank G. L. Millerson and C. T. Husbands for comments on the draft, and Beryl Collins and Bryn Saunders for help with the typing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acker, S. Sex differences in graduate student ambition: Do men publish while women perish?. Sex Roles 3, 285–299 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287616

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287616

Keywords

Navigation