Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 3–4, pp 363–375 | Cite as

The influence of sex-role stereotypes on prose recall

  • Diane F. Halpern
Article

Abstract

The influence of sex-role stereotypes on memory was investigated. High-school students read a short story about a protagonist named either Linda or David. Results indicated that when the sex of the protagonist was the same as their own, the students answered significantly more questions about the story correctly than in the cross-sex conditions. A qualitative analysis of the kinds of errors and inferences made revealed that female subjects tended to rely on sex-role stereotypes when answering factual questions about a male protagonist, and male subjects tended to rely on sex-role stereotypes when answering inference questions about a female protagonist. These results provide partial support for the notion that individuals are more predisposed to view members of the opposite sex stereotypically and are more likely to alter their memories in accordance with these stereotypes than they are when answering questions about members of their same sex.

Keywords

Qualitative Analysis Social Psychology Male Subject Female Subject Partial Support 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C. The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Montague, W. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sextyping. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354–364. (a)Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. Bem Sex Role Inventory Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981. (b)Google Scholar
  7. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 1979, 11, 177–220.Google Scholar
  8. Bransford, J. D. Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–79.Google Scholar
  10. Bugelski, B. R. Principles of learning and memory. New York: Praeger, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Cofer, C. N. Constructive processes in memory. American Scientist, 1973, 61, 37–543.Google Scholar
  12. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.Google Scholar
  13. Koblinsky, S. A., & Cruse, D. The role of frameworks in children's retention of sex-related story content. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981, 31, 321–331.Google Scholar
  14. Koblinsky, S. G., Cruse, D. F., & Sugawara, A. I. Sex role stereotypes and children's memory for story content. Child Development, 1978, 49, 452–458.Google Scholar
  15. Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. Gender-related schemata and constructive memory in children. Child Development, 1980, 51, 11–18.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F., Jr. A schematic model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 1981, 52, 1119–1134.Google Scholar
  17. Owens, J., Bower, G. H., & Black, J. B. The “soap opera” effect in story recall. Memory and Cognition, 1979, 7, 185–191.Google Scholar
  18. Rogers, T. B., Kulper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 677–688.Google Scholar
  19. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 941–950.Google Scholar
  21. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-feminity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, 43.Google Scholar
  22. Tagiuri, R. Person perception. In Lindzey, G., & Aronson, E. (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, Vol.3, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Thorndyke, P. W. Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 77–110.Google Scholar
  24. Witryol, S. L., & Kaess, W. A. Sex differences in social memory tasks. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 54, 343–346.Google Scholar
  25. Wrightsman, L. S. Social psychology, 2nd ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Women on Words and Images. Dick and Jane as victims: Sex stereotyping in children's readers. Princeton, NJ: Women on Words and Images, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane F. Halpern
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversitySan Bernardino

Personalised recommendations