This study examined sex differences in the quantity, targets, tone, and topics of gossip in the conversations of 76 male and 120 female college students. Contrary to popular beliefs, results indicated that the gossip of men and women contained similarities as well as differences. The data revealed that women spent more time gossiping than men and that women were much more likely than men to gossip about close friends and family members. However, no significant sex differences were uncovered regarding the derogatory tone of gossip and men and women were found to gossip about many of the same topics.
KeywordsFamily Member College Student Social Psychology Exploratory Analysis Close Friend
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cox, B. What is Hopi gossip about? Information management and Hopi factions. Man, 1970, 5, 88–98.Google Scholar
- Douvan, E., & Adelson, J. The adolescent experience. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
- Fine, G. A., & Rosnow, R. L. Gossip, gossipers, gossiping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 161–168.Google Scholar
- Haviland, J. B. Gossip as competition in Zinacantan. Journal of Communication, 1977, 26, 186–191.Google Scholar
- Jourard, S. M. Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
- Levin, J., & Kimmel, A. J. Gossip columns: Media small talk., Journal of Communication, 1977, 26, 169–175.Google Scholar
- Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
- Rysman, A. How the “gossip” became a woman. Journal of Communication, 1977, 26, 176–180.Google Scholar
- Szwed, J. F. Gossip, drinking, and social control: Consensus and communication in a New-foundland parish. Ethnology, 1966, 5, 434–441.Google Scholar
- Waldrop, M. F., & Halverson, C. F. Jr., Intensive and extensive peer behavior: Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses. Child Development, 1975, 46, 19–26.Google Scholar
- Wright, P. H., & Crawford, A. C. Argument and friendship: A close look and some second thoughts. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1977, 2, 52–69.Google Scholar