Abstract
Male and female subjects evaluated articles supposedly written by either a male or a female author of high or low professional status. Although evaluations by the male subjects appeared to be only slightly affected by the status variable, female subjects exhibited a complex reaction to the status variable and gave their most favorable evaluations to the high status woman and their least favorable evaluations to the low status woman. An evaluation-attribution hypothesis is presented to explain this response pattern. The significance of this response pattern for women who are attempting professional success and for the perception of female professional role models is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clifford, M., & Looft, W. Academic employment interviews: Effect of sex and race. Educational Researcher, 1971, 22, 6–8.
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 80–85.
Etaugh, C., & Rose, S. Adolescents' sex bias in the evaluation of performance. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 663–664.
Feather, N. T. Positive and negative reactions to male and female success and failure in relation to the perceived status and sex-typed appropriateness of occupations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 536–548.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Kiesler, S. Those who are number two try harder: The effects of sex on attribution of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 846–855.
Goldberg, P. A. Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, April 1968, 28–30.
Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Levenson, H., Burford, B., Bonno, B., & Davis, L. Are women still prejudiced against women? A replication and extension of Goldberg's study. Journal of Psychology, 1975, 89, 67–71.
Pheterson, G., Kiesler, S., & Goldberg, P. Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 114–118.
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Brian Peck for his help with data analysis and his insightful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peck, T. When women evaluate women, nothing succeeds like success: The differential effects of status upon evaluations of male and female professional ability. Sex Roles 4, 205–213 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287501
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287501