Abstract
Prime-time television programs were analyzed for frequencies of positive reinforcement and punishment exchanged among performers varying in age and sex. Results indicated that most responses were given by and directed to adult males. Moreover, while adult males exhibited and received similar frequencies of reinforcement and punishment, adult females were likely to give and to be the recipients of more reinforcement than punishment. Proportional analyses which controlled for sex differences in frequencies of responses revealed that females more often exhibited and received reinforcement, whereas males more often exhibited and received punishment. Results are interpreted from a social learning theory perspective and the implications for children's learning of positive and negative behaviors are explored.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 1–9.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 3–11. (a)
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 601–607. (b)
Bergreen, L. How do you measure violence? It depends on who is counting. TV Guide, 1977, 25(November 5), 5–10.
Charlesworth, R., & Hartup, W. W. Positive social reinforcement in the nursery school peer group. Child Development, 1967, 38, 993–1002.
Coates, B., & Pusser, H. E. Positive reinforcement and punishment in “Sesame Street” and “Mister Rogers.” Journal of Broadcasting, 1975, 19, 143–151.
Coates, B., Pusser, H. E., & Goodman, I. The influence of “Sesame Street” and “Mister Rogers' Neighborhood” on children's social behavior in the preschool. Child Development, 1976, 47, 138–144.
Cook, H., & Smothergill, D. Racial and sex determinants of imitative performance and knowledge in young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 211–215.
Fagot, B. I., & Patterson, G. R. An in vivo analysis of reinforcing contingencies for sex-role behaviors in the preschool child. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1, 563–568.
Frueh, T., & McGhee, P. E. Traditional sex role development and amount of time spent watching television. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 109.
Gerbner, G. Violence in television drama: Trends and symbolic functions. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 1. Media content and control. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972.
Hennessee, J. Analysis of WABC-TV programming. New York: National Organization for Women, 1971.
Hoffman, H. Report on monitoring of children's television programming aired by WRC-TV: A comparison of male and female roles. In National Organization for Women (Ed.), A study of the treatment of males and females in WRC-TV programming aired during a composite week. Washington, D.C.: National Organization for Women, 1972.
Liebert, R. M., Neale, J. M., & Davidson, E. S. The early window: Effects of television on children and youth. New York: Pergamon, 1973.
Lyle, J., & Hoffman, H. Children's use of television and other media. In E. A. Rubinstein, G. A. Comstock, & J. P. Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 4. Television in day-to-day life: Patterns of use. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
Mischel, W. A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.
Mischel, W. Sex-typing and socialization. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley, 1970.
Mischel, W., & Grusec, J. Determinants of the rehearsal and transmission of neutral and aversive behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 197–205.
Nolan, J. D., Galst, J. P., & White, M. A. Sex bias on children's television programs. Journal of Psychology, 1977, 96, 197–204.
Smith, P. K., & Daglish, L. Sex differences in parent and infant behavior in the home. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1250–1254.
Stein, A. H., & Friedrich, L. K. Impact of television on children and youth. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
Sternglanz, S. H., & Lyberger-Ficek, S. Sex differences in student-teacher interactions in the college classroom. Sex Roles, 1977, 3, 345–352.
Sternglanz, S. H., & Serbin, L. A. Sex role stereotyping in children's television programs. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 710–715.
Streicher, H. W. The girls in the cartoons. Journal of Communications, 1974, 24, 125–129.
Tedesco, N. S. Patterns in prime time. Journal of Communications, 1974, 24, 118–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downs, A.C., Gowan, D.C. Sex differences in reinforcement and punishment on prime-time television. Sex Roles 6, 683–694 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287489