Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the marriage-role expectations of college women enrolled in a functional marriage course in 1961, 1972, and 1978

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dunn Marriage Role Expectation Inventory was used to compare the marriage-role expectations of female university students enrolled in an introductory marriage and family course in 1961 (N=72), 1972 (N=58), and 1978 (N=115). The 1978 group was significantly more egalitarian than the 1961 group in overall marriage-role expectations and on each of the seven subcategories of authority, homemaking, child care, personal characteristics, social participation, education, and employment and support. The 1972 group was also found to be significantly more egalitarian than the 1961 group in overall marriage-role expectations and on all subcategories except authority. The 1978 group was significantly more egalitarian than the 1972 group only on authority and homemaking, with no significant differences on overall marriage-role expectations or on the other five subscales. The significant move toward more egalitarian attitudes toward authority and homemaking is accentuated by the fact that only 6 years separate the 1972 and 1978 groups, while there is an 11-year difference between the 1961 and 1972 groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamek, R. J. College major, work commitment and female perceptions of self, ideal women, and men's ideal women. Social Forces, 1970, 3, 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, E. M., & Angrist, S. S. Career salience and atypicality of occupational choice among college women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970, 32, 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, S. S., & Almquist, E. M. Careers and contingencies. New York: Dunellen, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. The future of marriage. New York: World, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., & Olesen, V. L. The career outlook of professionally educated women. Psychiatry, 1965, 28, 334–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M. S. Marriage role expectations of adolescents. Marriage and Family Living, 1960, 22, 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., & Urban, D. The institutionalization of equalitarian family norms. Marriage and Family Living, 1958, 20, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. F., & Bronzaft, A. L. Female freshmen view their roles as women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1972, 34, 671–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiken, K. F. Expectations concerning husband-wife responsibilities in the home. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1964, 26, 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbart, S. A comparison of attitudes toward women and attitudes toward Blacks in a southern city. Sociological Symposium, 1976, 17, 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C. A comparison of generations in regard to attitudes toward feminism. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1936, 49, 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, H. Z. Occupation: housewife. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Bumpass, L. L. U.S. women's sex-role ideology, 1970. American Journal of Sociology, 1975, 80, 1212–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W., & Martin, P. Y. Sex and sexism: A comparison of male and female sex-role attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 744–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parelius, A. P. Emerging sex-role attitudes, expectations, and strains among college women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloma, M. M., & Garland, T. N. The married professional woman: A study in tolerance of domestication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971, 33, 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallings, E. M., Anderson, E., & Weeks, O. Marriage role expectations of college women. Journal of Humanics, 1974, 1, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, B. S., & Labeff, E. Sex roles and feminism revisited: An intergenerational attitude comparison. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segrest, M. A., & Weeks, M. O. Comparison of the role expectations of married and cohabiting subjects. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 1976, 6, 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W., & Self, G. D. Feminists and traditionalists: An attitudinal comparison. Paper presented at the Alpha Kappa Delta Research Symposium, Richmond, Va. 1978.

  • Smith, M. D., & Self, G. D. The congruence between mothers' and daughters' sex-role attitudes: A research note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, R., Backman, E., & DiBona, P. The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977, 39, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, G. M., & Carter, D. C. A definition of the role of homemaker by two generations of women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1965, 27, 531–532.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The data were collected in February 1961, January 1972, and September 1978. Special acknowledgment and appreciation are expressed to Jessie Ringo (retired) for making the 1961 data available for this study and to William F. Kenkel, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, for his helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weeks, M.O., Gage, B.A. A comparison of the marriage-role expectations of college women enrolled in a functional marriage course in 1961, 1972, and 1978. Sex Roles 11, 377–388 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287466

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287466

Keywords

Navigation