Abstract
A sample of 58 college women and 43 college men were tested on Piaget's water-level task and asked to complete the Bem Sex Role Inventory. The instructions for the water-level task were varied so as to emphasize or deemphasize the scientific laboratory character of the task. Subjects were classified by sex, sex-role orientation (masculine, androgynous, feminine), task description condition, and water-level performance. A log-linear analysis of the resulting 2×3×2×2 multidimensional contingency table revealed significant main effects for both sex of subject and sex-role orientation. Males and those males and females with masculine sex-role orientations were more likely to succeed with the water-level task than females and those with feminine sex-role orientations. The effect of sex role on water-level performance emerged most clearly among highly sex-typed individuals and the effect of sex was significant only among those with androgynous sex-role orientations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Adair, J. G. The human subject: The social psychology of the psychological experiment. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1016–1023.
Bishop, V., Fienberg, S., & Holland, P. Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1975.
Dwyer, C. A. Influence of children's sex role standards on reading and arithmetic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 811–816.
Liben, L. S. Performance on Piagetian spatial tasks as a function of sex, field dependence, and training. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1978, 24, 97–110.
Maccoby, E. E. Sex differences in intellectual functioning. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.
Maxwell, J. W., Croake, J. W., & Biddle, A. P. Sex differences in the comprehension of spatial orientation. Journal of Psychology, 1975, 91, 127–131.
Milton, G. The effects of sex-role identification upon problem-solving skill. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 208–212.
Nash, S. C. The relationship among sex-role stereotyping, sex-role preference, and the sex difference in spatial visualization. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 15–32.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. The child's conception of space. New York: Norton, 1956.
Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
Thomas, H., & Jamison, W. On the acquisition of the understanding that still water is horizontal. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1975, 21, 31–44.
Willemsen, E., & Reynolds, B. Sex differences in adults' judgment of the horizontal. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 8, 309.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Cathy Gretzler for her help in collecting the data and Carolyn W. Sherif for her comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamison, W., Signorella, M.L. Sex-typing and spatial ability: The association between masculinity and success on piaget's water-level task. Sex Roles 6, 345–353 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287356
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Social Psychology
- Contingency Table
- Scientific Laboratory
- Spatial Ability
- College Woman