Abstract
University women preselected for traditionality of role orientation were administered a task described as a test either of intelligence or social skills. Results generally supported the hypothesis that instructions interact with a women's role orientation in determining both her achievement motivation, as measured projectively, and her performance. Differences in motivation and performance were interpreted in terms of women's definitions of appropriate achievement situations. Nontraditional women displayed achievement motivation on a projective measure under standard intellectual arousal conditions. Traditionally role-oriented women displayed greater achievement motivation under affiliative arousal conditions. The importance of measuring achievement in traditionally feminine areas, in addition to more traditionally masculine intellectual achievement, was stressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alper, T. G. The relationship between role-orientation and achievement motivation in college women. Journal of Personality, 1973, 41, 9–31.
Alper, T. G. Achievement motivation in college women: A now-you-see-it-now-you-don't phenomenon. American Psychologist, March 1974, pp. 194–203.
Danks, J. H. Encoding of novel figures for communication and memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 1979–191.
French, E. G., & Lesser, G. S. Some characteristics of the achievement motive in women. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 119–128.
Friedrich, L. K. Achievement motivation in college women revisited: Implications for women, men, and the gathering of coconuts. Sex Roles, 1976, 2(1), 47–61.
Horner, M. S. Femininity and successful achievement: A basic inconsistency. In J. Bardwick, E. Douvan, M. Horner, & D. Gutmann (Eds.), Feminine personality and conflict. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1970.
Horner, M. S. Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 157–176.
Lesser, G. Kravitz, R., & Packard, R. Experimental arousal of achievement motivation in adolescent girls. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 59–66.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
Monahan, L., Kuhn, D., & Shaver, P. Intrapsychic versus cultural explanations of the “fear of success” motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29(1), 60–64.
Tomlinson-Keasey, C. Role variables: Their influence on final motivational constructs. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974, 21(3), 323–237.
Veroff, J., Atkinson, J., Feld, S. C., & Gurin, G. The use of thematic apperception to assess motivation in a nationwide interview survey. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of this research were included in a thesis submitted by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.A. degree at the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gralewski, C., Rodgon, M.M. Effects of social and intellectual instruction on achievement motivation as a function of role orientation. Sex Roles 6, 301–309 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287351
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287351