Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 425–436 | Cite as

Stress experienced by women doctoral students, need for support, and occupational sex typing: An interactional view

  • Carole Kovalic Holahan
Article

Abstract

The present study was concerned with emotional stress experienced by women doctoral students as an interactive function of type of department and personal need for support. Subjects were women registered as doctoral students at a large state university in the fall semester of 1975. Of the total, 86 were from female minority departments, 177 from egalitarian departments, and 114 from female majority departments. Stress from time pressures, marital pressures, and overall stress were all found to be interactive functions of need for support and type of department. The female minority group showed the strongest relationship between need for support and each of the three significant stress variables. Implications of these findings for women in graduate school are discussed.

Keywords

Social Psychology Graduate School Strong Relationship Minority Group Time Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayer, A. E. College and university faculty: A statistical description (ACE Research Reports). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S., & Carper, J. The development of identification with an occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 1956, 61, 289–298.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, J. Academic women. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. Creager, J. A. The American graduate student: A normative description (ACE Research Reports, Vol. 6, No. 5). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 671–684.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, C. F. Encountering the male establishment: Sex-status limits on women's careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology, 1970, 75, 965–982.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, S. D. Escape from the doll's house. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, A. S. The second sex in academe. American Association of University Professors Bulletin, 1970, 283–295.Google Scholar
  9. Holmstrom, E. I., & Holmstrom, R. W. The plight of the woman doctoral student. American Educational Research Journal, 1974, 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
  10. Hooper, M. E. Earned degrees conferred: 1970–1971, summary data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, Government Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, D. N. Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, N.Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.Google Scholar
  13. Moos, R. H. Sources of variance in responses to questionnaires and in behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 405–412.Google Scholar
  14. Morlock, L. Discipline variation in the status of academic women. In A. S. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds.), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Murray, H. A. Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford, 1938.Google Scholar
  16. Oppenheimer, V. The sex-labelling of jobs. Industrial Relations, 1968, 7, 219–234.Google Scholar
  17. Pervin, L. A. Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 56–58.Google Scholar
  18. Simon, R. J., Clark, S. M., & Galway, K. The woman Ph.D.: A recent profile. Social Problems, 1967, 15, 221–236.Google Scholar
  19. Stern, G. G. People in context: Measuring person-environment congruence in education and industry. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Veldman, D. G. VSTAT user manual. Austin, Tex.: Ibid., Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Ward, J. H., & Jennings, E. Introduction to linear models. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. White, M. S. Psychological and social barriers to women in science. Science, 1970, 170, 413–416.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole Kovalic Holahan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinUSA

Personalised recommendations