Skip to main content
Log in

Satisfaction with intimate exchange: Gender-role differences and the impact of equity, equality, and rewards

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative effects of equity, equality, and reward level upon assessments of marital satisfaction are investigated. In doing so, the impact of gender-role orientation upon the relationship between the predictor variables and marital satisfaction is specified. The data indicate that reward level is the major variable affecting assessments of satisfaction for both moderns and traditionals. Further, the effect of reward level is more pronounced for those with modern gender-role orientations. Contrary to expectation, the effects of the exchange-related variables, equity and equality, are minimal for both moderns and traditionals. These findings suggest that intimates, regardless of gender-role orientation, tend to avoid the “bookkeeping” involved in global equity and equality comparisons and instead accentuate individual reward levels. It appears, however, that moderns are significantly more demanding than traditionals in their emphasis upon reward levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. Inequality in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogan, D., & Kutner, N. G. Measuring sex role orientation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. L., & Nielsen, J. An experimental analysis of some structural determinants of equitable and inequitable exchange relationships. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 427–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., Henton, J. M., & Larson, J. M. Fairness and reward level as predictors of relationship satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1982, 45, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. Equity, equality and need: What determines which will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., Foa, E. B. Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. Social exchange in developing relationships: An overview. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, R. N., & Pedhazur, F. J. Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. W. Structural exchange and marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1981, 43, 825–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. A macro- and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. Psychology and the American Ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 767–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. Social processes and power in families. In W. Burr, R. Hill, F. Nye, & I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research-based theories (Vol. 1). New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. The social psychology of the gift. American Journal of Sociology, 1967, 73, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier dyadic adjustment scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1982, 44, 739–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, G. W. The Walster et al. (1973) equity formula: A correction. Representative Research, 1975, 6, 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Gary Hansen for his assistance in the collection of the data for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, M.W. Satisfaction with intimate exchange: Gender-role differences and the impact of equity, equality, and rewards. Sex Roles 13, 597–605 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287297

Keywords

Navigation