Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumental and expressive socialization: A false dichotomy

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barry, Bacon, and Child's (1957) cross-cultural study of sex differences in childhood socialization has been influential in bolstering the instrumental—expressive sex-role dichotomy. We critique their method of data analysis and factor analyze their data. Expressive and instrumental socialization are found to be separate factors or dimensions, rather than opposite ends of a single dichotomy. Additionally, no factor representing sex differences in socialization emerges, but rather each factor tends to contain substantively similar emphases in the training of both boys and girls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronoff, J., & Crano, W. D. A re-examination of the cross-cultural principles of task segregation and sex role differentiation in the family. American Sociological Review, 1975, 40, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Bacon, M. K., & Child, I. L. A cross-cultural survey of some sex differences in socialization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Bacon, M. K., & Child, I. L. Definitions, ratings and bibliographic sources for child training practices of 110 cultures. In C. S. Ford (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches. New Haven: Yale University, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternate procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. Relationship between differentiation and equality in the sex role structure. In L. Lenero-Otero (Ed.), Beyond the nuclear family model. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. Margaret Mead and Samoa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, L. M. Women and dualism. New York: Longman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, L. Economy and child training reexamined. Ethos, 1985, 13, 246–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. D., & Hendrix, L. A cross cultural testing of Collins's theory of sexual stratification. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1982, 44, 675–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., & Worell, J. New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1101–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. Task and social behavior in marriage. In N. W. Bell & E. F. Vogel (Eds.), A modern introduction to the family. New York: Free Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: William Morrow, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minturn, L., & Guthrie, P. Ethnographer oversight in reporting of sex differences in aggression training. Behavior Science Research, 1978, 13, 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, T. The social system. New York: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N. V., & Martin, H. J. Convergent and discriminant validity of selected masculinity and femininity scales. Sex Roles, 1984, 10, 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. A. SAS User's Guide. Cary NC: SAS Institute, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C., & Offir, C. The longest war. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, S. Sex roles. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M. K. Family role differentiation and women's subsistence contribution. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 376–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M. K. Cross-cultural studies of women and the male bias problem. Behavioral Science Research, 1978, 13, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. Role differentiation in the nuclear family. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales. Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendrix, L., Johnson, G.D. Instrumental and expressive socialization: A false dichotomy. Sex Roles 13, 581–595 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287296

Keywords

Navigation