Abstract
Using biographical data from what we call a focused sample of 36 elite women, the conjugal power structure of their parental families is examined to assess its impact upon the development of political women. The results revealed that the mothers of elite political women scored higher on indices of independence both within the family structure and outside the home than did the mothers of elite nonpolitical women. The fathers of the elite political women tended to show more respect and love for their wives than did the fathers of the elite nonpolitical women. The fathers of elite political women also tended to view their work as interesting and fun rather than as just a job. The elite political women were also less likely to have brothers, particularly older brothers, than the nonpolitical women. This finding suggests that female involvement in politics is not necessarily derived from cross-sex-role preferences. The study suggests that in terms of political socialization, the father's behavior and achievements are not as critical for his daughter as they are for his son. Their importance for the daughter must be filtered through the effect the father and his behavior have on the mother and the sex-role ideology held by the family.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, A. What life should mean to you. Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1931.
Altus, W. D. Birth order and scholastic aptitude. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 202–205. (a)
Altus, W. D. Birth order and academic primogeniture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 872–876. (b)
Baruch, G. K. Maternal influences upon college women's attitudes toward women and work. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6(January) 32–37.
Cushna, B. Birth order and verbal mastery. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, September 1968.
Darcy, R., & Schramm, S. S. Women types: Differential responses to politics. Paper presented to the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, November 1976.
Duverger, M. Political role of women. Paris: UNESCO, 1955.
Greeley, A. M. A Model for ethnic political socialization. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19(2), 187–206.
Hess, R., & Torney, J. The development of political attitudes in children. New York: Doubleday, 1967.
Hoffman, L. W. Early childhood experiences and women's achievement motives. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 129f.
Jaquette, J. S. (Ed.) Women in politics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
Kagan, J., & Moss, H. Birth to maturity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1962.
Kammeyer, K. Birth order and the feminine sex-role among college women. American Sociological Review, 1966, 31(August), 508–515.
Kelly, R. M., & Boutilier, M. A. The making of the political woman: A study of socialization and role conflict. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1978.
Langton, K. P. Political socialization. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.
Lipman-Blumen, J. How ideology shapes women's lives. Scientific American, 1972, 226 (January), 34–42.
Lynn, D. B. Parental and sex-role identification: A theoretical formulation. Berkeley: McCutchen Publishers Co., 1969.
McCandless, B. R., & Evans, E. D. Children and youth: Psychosocial development. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press, 1973. Pp. 39–40.
Miller, S. M. Effects of maternal employment on sex role perception, interest, and self-esteem in kindergarten girls. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11(3), 405–406.
Mitchell, G. & Schroers, L. Birth order and parental experience in monkeys and man. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 159–184.
Nash, J. Developmental psychology: A psychobiological approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
Peatman, J. Introduction to applied statistics. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1963.
Renshon, S. Birth order, personality, and political socialization. In D. Schwartz & S. Schwartz (Eds.), New directions in political socialization. New York: Free Press, 1974. (a)
Renshon, S. Psychological needs and political behavior: A theory of personality and political efficacy. New York: Free Press, 1974. (b)
Sampson, E. E. The study of the ordinal position. In B. Mayer (Ed.), Advances in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press, 1964.
Schachter, S. The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959.
Smelser, W. T., & Stewart, L. D. Where are the siblings: Reevaluation of the relationship between birth order and college attendance. Sociometry, 1968, 31, 294–303.
Stouffer, S. A. Social research to test ideas. New York: Free Press, 1962.
Sutton-Smith, B., & Rosenberg, B. G. The sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.
Toman, W. Family constellation. New York: Springer, 1969.
Vogel, S. R., Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F., & Rosencrantz, P. S. Maternal employment and perception of sex roles among college students. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 3, 384–391.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, R.M., Boutilier, M.A. Mothers, daughters, and the socialization of political women. Sex Roles 4, 415–443 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287293