Skip to main content
Log in

A model of contemporary feminine role change and family size

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a review of existing theory and research a model was constructed which traces the restricting effect female employment has on family size through a discussion of intervening psychological variables. The model presents four psychological changes that are associated with paid employment of middle-class women in the United States: (1) increased self-orientation, (2) increased feelings of personal efficacy, (3) the increased belief that the spouse holds expectations for female autonomy, and (4) the increased belief that female employment outside the home is socially acceptable. It is suggested that these variables act to restrict family size through their effects on desired family size, perceived desired family size of the husband, expected family size, commitment to employment, and occupational satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnott, C. C. Husbands' attitudes and wives' commitment to employment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1972, 34, 673–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson, L. J. Some differences in the perception of the working wife between husbands and wives. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Sociological Association, Atlanta, 1970. (Abstract)

  • Blake, J. Demographic science and the redirection of population policy. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1965, 18, 1181–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. Husbands and wives. New York: Pergamon Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatta, E. F., & Westoff, C. F. The prediction of total fertility. In P. K. Whelpton & C. V. Kiser (Eds.), Social and psychological factors affecting fertility (Vol. 4). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers, R., & Blumberg, G. H. Social and psychological factors in human procreation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1954, 40, 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, L. H., & Day, A. T. Family size in industrial countries: An inquiry into the socialcultural determinants of childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1969, 31, 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. Women's place. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fand, A. B. Sex role and self concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1955. (Abstract)

  • Farley, J. Graduate women: Career aspirations and desired family size. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1099–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. T. Psychology and population. New York: The Population Council, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. T., & Bornstein, M. H. Modernization, individual modernity and fertility. In J. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. Feelings of adjustment. In F. I. Nye & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), The employed mother in America. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, M. P., Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. Sex, career and family. London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Coombs, L., & Bumpass, L. Stability and change in expectations about family size: A longitudinal study. Demography, 1965, 2, 250–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., & Whelpton, P. K. Fertility planning and fertility rates by adherence to traditions. In P. K. Whelpton & C. V. Kiser (Eds.), Social and psychological factors affecting fertility (Vol. 3). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavron, H. The captive wife. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianopulus, A., & Mitchell, H. E. Marital disagreement in working wife marriages as a function of husband's attitude toward wife's employment. Marriage and Family Living, 1957, 19, 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D., Sharp, H., & Freedman, R. The stability and reliability of expected family size. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1959, 27, 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gump, J. P. Sex role attitudes and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. E. Some implications of current changes in sex role patterns. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1960, 6, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. H. Maternal role incompatibility and fertility in urban Latin America. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D. M. Dominance and the working wife. Social Forces, 1958, 36, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R. The changing image of the career woman. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W., & Hoffman, M. L. The value of children to parents. In J. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, L. L. The two career family. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holter, H. Sex roles and social change. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women. Lexington, Massachusetts: Xerox, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kar, S. B. Individual aspirations as related to early and late acceptance of contraception. Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 83, 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. Demographic influences in female employment and the status of women. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 946–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., & Hoffman, L. W. The Employed Mother in America. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E. Working women. Daedalus, 1964, 93, 671–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlman, E. The psychology of birth planning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population and the American future: The report of the commission on population growth and the American future. New York: The American Library, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L., & Whelpton, P. K. Extra familial participation of wives in relation to interest in and liking for children, fertility planning and actual and desired family size. In P. K. Whelpton & C. V. Kiser (Eds.), Social and psychological factors affecting fertility (Vol. 4). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, J. C. The effect of population change on the roles and status of women: perspectives and speculation. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women. Lexington, Massachusetts: Xerox, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, R., & Whelpton, P. K. Attitudes toward restriction of personal freedom in relation to fertility planning and fertility. In P. K. Whelpton & C. V. Kiser (Eds.), Social and psychological factors affecting fertility (Vol. 4). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. Family development in a changing world. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1972, 128, 1057–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, A. E., & Haas, M. B. The working mother: A review of the research. Child Development, 1963, 34, 513–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. The attitudes toward women scale. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1973. (Monograph)

  • Weller, R. H. The employment of wives, role incompatibility and fertility: A study of middle class residents of Puerto Rico. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1968, 46, 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., & Kiser, C. V. An empirical re-examination and inter-correlation of selected hypothesis factors. In P. K. Whelpton & C. V. Kiser (Eds.), Social and psychological factors affecting fertility (Vol. 4). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., Mishler, E. G., & Kelly, L. E. Preference in size of family and eventual fertility 20 years after. American Journal of Sociology, 1957, 62, 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelpton, P. K., Campbell, A. A., & Patterson, J. Fertility and family planning in the U.S. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. B. Subjective efficacy and ideal family size as predictors of favorability toward birth control. Demography, 1970, 7, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yockey, J.M. A model of contemporary feminine role change and family size. Sex Roles 1, 69–81 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287214

Keywords

Navigation