Skip to main content
Log in

The psychology of tokenism: An analysis

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

American society is analyzed as a gender-class system wherein tokenism is defined as a form of interclass mobility. Two role partners, Sponsor and Token, sustain the institution of tokenism: the Token is a member of the deviant class and the Sponsor is a member of the dominant class. The content and functioning of this role partnership are broadly defined. The limitations of tokenism and implications for change in the social system are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almquist, E., & Angrist, S. Role model influences on college women's career aspirations. Paper read at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, 1970.

  • Angelou, M. I know why the caged bird sings. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. New York: Van Nostrand, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. Memoirs of a dutiful daughter. New York: Harper/Colophon Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. Encountering the male establishment: Sex-status limits on women's careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology, 1970, 75(6), 965–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, L. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1094–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., Gurin, G., Lao, R. C., & Beattie, M. Internal-external control in the motivational dynamics of Negro youth. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25(3), 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H. M. Women as a minority group. Social Forces, 1951, 30, 60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, M. M. Family dynamics for developing positive achievement motivation in women: The successful woman executive. In R. Kundsin, (Ed.), Successful women in the sciences: An analysis of determinants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, 208, 76–81.

  • Laws, J. L. The regulation of mobility in the gender-class system: An analysis of tokenism. Women's Studies, 1975, forthcoming.

  • Lester, R. A. Anti-bias regulations of universities: Faculty problems and their solutions. New York: McGraw-Hill 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S. Barriers to the career choice of engineering, medicine or science among American women. In J. A. Mattfeld & C. G. Van Aken (Eds.), Women and the scientific professions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S. Status of women in graduate departments of sociology, 1968–69. American Sociologist, February 1970, 5, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

  • Selznick, P. T.V.A. and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. A myth is better than a miss: Men get the edge in academic employment. College and University Business, February 1970, 72–73.

  • Tangri, S. S. Determinants of occupational role innovation among college women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laws, J.L. The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles 1, 51–67 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287213

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287213

Keywords

Navigation