Abstract
An argument for “welfarist” social evaluation is presented that replaces the independence axiom with a consistency axiom for social-evaluation functionals in economic environments. This axiom (consistency across dimension or COAD) requires that, if two allocations contain suballocations in common, and if individual utility functions are projected down to the smaller economy where allocations change, then these small allocations must be ranked in the same way that their ancestral allocations were.
The basic result is applied to different information environments and a variety of ethical axioms appropriate to economic environments is investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1980) A theoretical treatment of indices of absolute inequality. Int Econ Rev 21:107–136
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1982) Ratio-scale and translation-scale full interpersonal comparability without domain restrictions: admissible social-evaluation functions. Int Econ Rev 23:249–268
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1986) Money metric utility: a harmless normalization? UBC Discussion Paper, no 86-09
Blackorby C, Donaldson D, Weymark J (1984) Social choice with interpersonal utility comparisons: a diagrammatic introduction. Int Econ Rev 25:327–356
Blau J (1957) The existence of social welfare functions. Econometrica 25:302–313
Border D (1983) Social welfare functions for economic environments with and without the Pareto principle. J Econ Theory 29:205–216
Campbell D (1986) Arrow's theorem for economic environments and continuous social preferences. Mimeo, University of Toronto
D'Aspremont C, Gevers L (1977) Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Rev Econ Stud 44:77–94
Deaton A (1980) The measurement of welfare: theory and practical guidelines. Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper No. 7, World Bank
Donaldson D, Weymark J (1980) A single-parameter generalization of the Gini inequality indices. J Econ Theory 22:67–86
Donaldson D, Weymark J (1985) Social choice in economic environments. UBC Discussion Paper, no 85-20
Gorman W (1959) Are social indifference curves convex? Q J Econ 73:485–496
Hammond P (1976) Equity, Arrow's conditions and Rawls' difference principle. Econometrica 44: 793–804
Hammond P (1979) Equity in two person situations: some consequences. Econometrica 47:1127–1136
Hardy G, Littlewood J, Polya G (1934) Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, London
Howe R (1987) Sections and extensions of concave functions. J Math Econ 6:53–64
Kalai E, Muller E, Satterthwaite M (1977) Social welfare functions when preferences are convex, strictly monotonic and continuous. Public Choice 34:87–97
Kannai Y (1977) Concavifiability and constructions of concave utility functions. J Math Econ 4:1–56
King M (1983) Welfare analysis of tax reform using household data. J Pub Econ 21:183–214
Roberts K (1980a) Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levels. Rev Econ Stud 47:409–420
Roberts K (1980b) Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory. Rev Econ Stud 47:421–439
Roemer J (1985a) Equality of resources implies equality of welfare. Q J Econ 101:751–784
Roemer J (1985b) Equality of talent. Econ Philos I:151–86
Roemer J (1985e) Axiomatic bargaining theory on economic environments, University of California, Davis, Working Paper 264; Econ Theory (forthcoming)
Roemer J (1987) Egalitarianism, responsibility, and information. Econ Philos (forthcoming)
Sen A (1973) On economic inequality. Clarendon, Oxford
Sen A (1974) Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches: aggregation and income distribution. J Pub Econ 3:387–403
Sen A (1977a) The poverty of welfarism. Int Econ Rev 8:1–13
Sen A (1977b) Social choice theory: a reexamination. Econometrica 45:53–89
Sen A (1979) Personal utilities and public judgements: or what's wrong with welfare economics. Econ J 89:537–558
Sen A (1984) Social choice theory: In: Arrow K, Intriligator M (eds) Handbook of mathematical economics III. North Holland, Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are indebted to Charles Blackorby, Erwin Diewert, Ed Morey, Bill Schworm and John Weymark for helpful discussions, and to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Killiam Foundation and the National Science Foundation, for research support.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donaldson, D., Roemer, J.E. Social choice in economic environments with dimensional variation. Soc Choice Welfare 4, 253–276 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286867
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286867