Abstract
The study seeks to ascertain whether the operational definition of “gentrification” has an impact on the apparent extent, location and causal factors associated with the phenomenon. Four alternative definitional criteria are specified, based on areal changes in: proportion black, proportion college-educated, real incomes and real property values. The stringency of the given change needed to qualify as gentrification is also varied. Census tract changes from 1970–80 in Philadelphia are analyzed. Results indicate great sensitivity in the number and location of “gentrified” tracts to the definition chosen and stringency applied. Even more importantly, the 1970 characteristics of tracts which statistically explain their subsequent gentrication vary dramatically across these definitions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
BradleyDonald S.: 1978, ‘Back to the city?’, Atlanta Economic Review 28 (2) (March/April), pp. 15–20.
ClayPhillip: 1979, Neighborhood Renewal. Middle Class Resettlement in American Neighborhoods (Health/Lexington Books, Lexington).
CybriwskyRoman: 1978, ‘Social aspects of neighborhood change’, Annals of Assoc. of American Geographers 68 (March), pp. 17–33.
DeGiovanniFrank: 1983, ‘Patterns of change in housing market activity in revitalizing neighborhoods’, Journal of American Planning Association 49 (Winter), pp. 22–39.
GaleDennis: 1984, Neighborhood Revitalization and the Postindustrial City (Heath/Lexington Books, Lexington).
Galster, George and Stephen Peacock: 1984, ‘Explaining urban gentrification: Whatever it is’, paper presented at ASSA/AREUEA Meetings, Dallas.
HenigJames: 1980, ‘Gentrification and displacement within cities’, Social Science Quarterly 64 (3 & 4), pp. 638–651.
HolcombH. and RobertBeauregard: 1981, Revitalizing Cities (Association of American Geographers, Washington).
Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress: 1979, Is the Urban Crisis Over? (USGPO, Washington).
LaskaS., J.Seaman, and D.McSeveney: 1982, ‘Inner city reinvestment: Neighborhood characteristics and spatial patterns over time’, Urban Studies 19 (May), pp. 155–165.
LaskaShirley and DaphneSpan: 1979, ‘Urban policy planning in the wake of gentrification: Anticipating renovators' demands’, Journal of the American Planning Association 45 (October), pp. 523–531.
LaskaShirley and DaphneSpan (eds.): 1980, Back To the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation (Pergamon Press, New York).
LeeBarrett and PaulaMergenhagen: 1984, ‘Is revitalization detectable?’, Urban Affairs Quarterly 19 (June), pp. 511–538.
LevyPaul: 1978, Queen Village: The Eclipse of a Community (Institute for Study of Civic Values, Philadelphia).
LondonBruce: 1980, ‘Gentrification as urban reinvasion’, pp. 77–94 in Laska and Spain, Back To the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation (Pergamon Press, New York).
O'LoughlinJ. and D.Munski: 1979, ‘Housing rehabilitation in the inner city: A comparison of two neighborhoods in New Orleans’, Economic Geography 55 (January), pp. 52–71.
PalenJ. and BruceLondon: 1984, Gentrification, Displacement and Neighborhood Revitalization (SUNY Press, Albany).
PindyckRobert and DanielRubinfeld: 1981, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (McGraw Hill, New York).
SchillMichael and ArthurMaurice: 1981, ‘Gentrification and the census’, American Demographics 3 (April), pp. 4–5.
SchillMichael and RichardNathan: 1983, Revitalizing America's Cities (SUNY Press, Albany).
WurmanSaul and JohnGallery: 1972, Man Made Philadelphia: A Guide to Its Physical and Cultural Environment (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galster, G., Peacock, S. Urban gentrification: Evaluating alternative indicators. Soc Indic Res 18, 321–337 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286623
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286623