Skip to main content
Log in

Money value of consumption and income of rural families: Two measures of economic status

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a measure of economic status, money value of consumption, is defined and its relationship to income is examined using data collected from 628 U.S. rural families and 1170 North Carolina rural families. Findings suggest that for rural families money value of consumption is linearly related to income, that the variance of money value of consumption is proportional to income and that money value of consumption is more equally distributed than income. Money value of consumption is more closely related to income for one-and four-or-more-person families than for two-or-three-person families. A comparison of how the two measures (money value of comsumption and income) rank rural families by consumption status indicates that income is most likely to rank families inaccurately at very low and very high levels of income. Findings should assist in the appropriate interpretation of income when it is used as a proxy for consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ando, A. and Modigliani, F.: 1963, ‘The ‘Life-Cycle’ Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests’, American Economic Review 53 (1, Part 1), 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J. C. and Sharp, E. F.: 1952, ‘A Short Scale for Measuring Farm Family Level of Living: A Modification of Sewell's Socio-Economic Scale’, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. T-46, Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College, Stillwater, Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M.Jr.: 1972, Social Statistics (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, E. C. and Radner, D. B.: 1969, ‘The OBE Size Distribution Series: Methods and Tentative Results for 1964’, American Economic Review 59, 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S.: 1928, ‘A Quantitative Scale for Rating the Home and Social Environment of Middle Class Families in an Urban Community: A First Approximation to the Measurement of Socio-Economic Status’, Journal of Educational Psychology 19(2), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S.: 1933, The Measurement of Social Status, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. L.: 1965, ‘Level-of-Living Scales’, in C. L.Cleland, ed., Scaling Social Data, pp. 17–29, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 108, Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Statiion Knoxville, Tenn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. S.: 1945, ‘Standards and Content of Living’, American Economic Review 35, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. J.: 1965, ‘Home-Produced Food of Farm Families’, Family Economics Review (October), 3–6.

  • Freedman, D. S.: 1972, ‘Consumption Aspirations as Economic Incentives in a Developing Country-Taiwan’, in B.Strumpel, J. N.Morgan, and E.Zahn (eds.), Human Behavior in Economic Affairs, pp. 229–259, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagood, M. J.: 1952, Farm-Operator Family Level of Living Indexes for Counties of the United States, 1930, 1940, 1945, and 1950, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, E. L.: 1926, The Farmer's Standard of Living: A Socio-Economic Study of 2,886 White Farm Families of Selected Localities in 11 States, U.S. Department of Agriculture Bulletin No. 1466, U.S. Government Printing Office (1929), Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrk, H.: 1950, ‘The Income Distribution as a Measure of Economic Welfare’, American Economic Review 40, 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. B. and Kish, L.: 1957, ‘Family Life Cycle as an Independent Variable’, American Sociological Review 22, 512–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, J. L.: 1974, Factors Associated with Level of Living in Washington County, Mississippi (Technical Bulletin No. 1501), Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, D., Brady, D. S., Perry, M., Cronister, K., and Rainboth, E. D.: 1941, Family Income and Expenditures: Five Regions, Part 2, Family Expenditures, U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication No. 465, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. N.: 1968, ‘The Supply of Effort, the Measurement of Well-Being, and the Dynamics of Improvement’, American Economic Review 58(2), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. N.: 1974, The Changing Economic Status of 5,000 American Families: Highlights from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Office of Economic Opportunity, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. N. and Smith, J. D.: 1969, ‘Measures of Economic Well-Offness and their Correlates’, American Economic Review 59, 450–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.: 1964, ‘Potential Income from Assets: Findings of the 1963 Survey of the Aged’, Social Security Bulletin 27(12), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orshansky, M.: 1965, ‘Who's Among the Poor: A Demographic View of Poverty’, Social Security Bulletin 28(7), 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orshansky, M.: 1969, ‘How Poverty is Measured’, Monthly Labor Review 92(2), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J. L.: 1964, Rural Family Spending and Consumption in a Low-Income Area in Kentucky (Home Economics Research Report No. 26), Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. J. and Houthakker, H. S.: 1955, The Analysis of Family Budgets, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachal, J. V., Bates, J. D., and Gould, A. L.: 1971, An Index of Economic Status of Individual Rural Families, Final Report SU-346 for the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Contract No. 12–14–100–8954(62), Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachal, J. V., Bates, J. D., Poole, W. K. and Moore, R. P.: 1972, An Operational Consumption Measure of Economic Status: With Applicability to United States Rural Families Final Report 23U-669 for the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture under Contract No. 12–14–100–11023(62), Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. G.: 1952, ‘Effect of Income Concept upon Expenditure Curves of Farm Families’, in Studies in Income and Wealth 15, 133–174, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoelders, G., and Biervert, V.: 1972, ‘Level of Aspiration and Consumption Standard: Some General Findings’, in B.Strumpel, J. N.Morgan, and E.Zahn, (eds.), Human Behavior in Economic Affairs, pp. 213–227, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somermeyer, W. H. and Bannick, R.: 1973, A Consumption-Savings Model and its Applications, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R., Rowe, D. A., Corlett, W. J., Hurstfield, R., and Potter, M.: 1954, The Measurement of Consumers' Expenditure and Behavior in the United Kingdom, 1920–1938, I., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydenstricker, E. and King, W. I.: 1921, ‘The Measurement of the Relative Economic Status of Families’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 17(135), 842–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census: 1969, ‘Revision in Poverty Statistics, 1959–1968’, Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 28.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics: 1972, Consumer Price Index.

  • Weisbrod, B. A. and Hansen, W. L.: 1968, ‘An Income-Net Worth Approach to Measuring Economic Welfare’, American Economic Review 58 (5, Part I), 1315–1329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work reported here was conducted by the authors while on the staff of the Consumer and Food Economics Institute, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rudd, N.M., Kline, K.L. Money value of consumption and income of rural families: Two measures of economic status. Soc Indic Res 3, 217–236 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286304

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286304

Keywords

Navigation