Skip to main content
Log in

Population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene are explored. With some broad assumptions, the consequences of the model are that (a) 50% of mothers of probands carry the premutation; (b) 6.5% of mothers of probands receive the premutation from their mothers, 18.9% from their fathers, and 24.6% as a “new mutation”; (c) the incidence of carriers for the full mutation equals the incidence of affected males, whereas the incidence of carriers for the premutation is 1.35 times the incidence of affected males; (d) assuming mutation rates are equal in eggs and sperm, the mutation rate from normal to premutation alleles is 1.67x10-4; (e) the expected segregation ratio in sibs of probands is 0.44, which corresponds to observed values. In addition, predictions using the premutation hypothesis of the expected segregation ratio in sibs of mothers of probands fits well with the data of Vogel and coworkers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fryns JP (1986) The female and fragile X. Am J Med Genet 23:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Pembrey ME, Winter RM, Davies KE (1985) A premutation that generates a defect at crossing over explains the inheritance of fragile X mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 21:709–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SL, Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Turner G (1984) The marker X chromosome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis. Ann Hum Genet 48:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SL, Jacobs PA, Morton NE, Froster-Iskenius U, Howard-Peebles PN, Nielsen KB, Partington MW, Sutherland GR, Turner G, Watson M (1985) Further segregation analysis of the fragile X syndrome with special reference to transmitting males. Hum Genet 69:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel F, Krüger J, Nielsen KB, Fryns JP, Schindler D, Schinzel A, Schmidt A, Schwinger E (1985) Recurrent mutation pressure does not explain the prevalence of the marker (X) syndrome. Hum Genet 71:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter RM, Pembrey ME (1982) Does unequal crossing over contribute to the mutation rate in Duchenne muscular dystrophy? Am J Med Genet 12:437–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter RM, Pembrey ME (1986) Analysis of linkage relationships between genetic markers around the fragile X locus with special reference to the daughters of normal transmitting males. Hum Genet 74:93–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winter, R.M. Population genetics implications of the premutation hypothesis for the generation of the fragile X mental retardation gene. Hum Genet 75, 269–271 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281072

Keywords

Navigation