Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 86, Issue 1–4, pp 93–99 | Cite as

Mercury levels and discharge in waste water from dental clinics

  • D. Arenholt-Bindslev
  • A. H. Larsen
Article

Abstract

Data was obtained on the amount of Hg discharged with the waste water from dental clinics. Waste water from 20 Danish dental clinics was collected during one working day and analyzed for the total amount of Hg using the technique of cold vapour atomic absorption spectrophotometry (CVAAS). From clinics without amalgam separator mean value was 270 mg Hg dentist−1 d−1 (range 65 to 842), from clinics equipped with amalgam separator mean value was 35 mg Hg dentist−1 d−1 (range 12 to 99). It was concluded that Hg is released with the waste water from dental clinics. Several hundred grams of Hg clinic−1 may be discharged annually with the waste water. Installation of efficient amalgam separators may reduce the Hg outlet markedly.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenholt-Bindslev, D.: 1991, in P. Hörsted-Bindslev, L. Magos, P. Holmstrup and D. Arenholt-Bindslev (eds.), Dental amalgam — a health hazard?, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
  2. Arenholt-Bindslev D.: 1992, in B. Bergman, H. Bostrom, K. Sune Larsson and H. Löe (eds.), Potential biological consequences of Mercury released from dental amalgam, Proceedings from a State of the Art conference. Swedish medical Research Council, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  3. Fischer, W. and Bohrer, G.: 1989, Schweiz. Monatsschr Zahnmed. 99, 61–68.Google Scholar
  4. Graf, W., Sühs, K., Pfarrer, R.: 1988, Zahnärztl. Mitteil. 78, 214–218.Google Scholar
  5. Hogland, W., Jensson, B. and Petersson, P.: 1990, University of Lund, Sweden. Internrapport 3132.Google Scholar
  6. Hörsted-Bindslev, P and Mjör, I. (eds.): 1988, Modern concepts in operative dentistry, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 146–188.Google Scholar
  7. Lindqvist, O., Johansson, K., Aastrup, M., Andersson, A., Bringmark, L., Hovseniu, G., Håkanson, L., Iverfeldt, Å., Meili, M. and Timm, B.: 1991, Water Air and Soil Poll. 55, 1–251.Google Scholar
  8. NIH, 1992: Effects and side-effects of dental restorative materials. National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. National Institutes of Health, Washington, pp. 2–14.Google Scholar
  9. OECD, 1991: Risk reduction activities. Nordic paper on Mercury. OECD 1991-04-11, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers, K. D.: 1989, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 119, 159–166.Google Scholar
  11. Senkpiel, K., Pasch, J., Ohgke, H. and Beckert, J.: 1989a, Zbl. Hyg. 188, 254–261.Google Scholar
  12. Senkpiel, K., Pasch, J., Ohgke, H. and Beckert, J.: 1989b, Hyg. Med. 14, 283–288.Google Scholar
  13. SM 302 D. Nitric acid digestion: 1985, in M. Franson (ed.), Standard Methods, 16th. ed., For the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, p. 148.Google Scholar
  14. SM 303 F. Determination of mercury by the cold vapor technique: 1985, in M. Franson (ed.), Standard Methods, 16th. ed., For the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, p. 171.Google Scholar
  15. WHO: 1976, Environmental Health Criteria 1: Mercury. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  16. WHO: 1991, Environmental Health Criteria 118: Inorganic Mercury. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Arenholt-Bindslev
    • 1
  • A. H. Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations