Skip to main content
Log in

Azelastine reduces allergen-induced nasal response: a clinical and rhinomanometric assessment

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of azelastine 2 mg b.d. p.o. for 10 days on grass pollen-induced nasal responses in 16 patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis has been assessed. The study was a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, crossover trial, with a 10–14 day wash-out period. Patients were challenged with grass pollen before and after placebo and azelastine. The response was assessed by measurement of nasal resistance using active posterior rhinomanometry, by weighing nasal secretions, and by counting sneezes. The sensation of nasal obstruction was assessed with a visual analogue scale. After measurement of baseline total nasal resistance, doubling doses of allergen were sprayed into both nostrils at 15 min intervals until the nasal resistance was doubled.

Cumulative doses of allergen that doubled prechallenge nasal resistance, numbers of sneezes and the amounts of nasal secretions were similar before azelastine as well as before and after placebo (cumulative dose, mean, (μg):2.3, 4.2 and 2.1 respectively, N.S.). After azelastine, the cumulative dose of allergen was increased (7.3 μg), and nasal secretions and the number of sneezes were decreased. The visual analogue scores were similar before and after azelastine as well as before and after the placebo.

It is concluded that azelastine reduced the allergeninduced nasal responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Borum P, Mygind N (1980) Inhibition of the immediate allergic reaction in the nose by the beta-2 adrenostimulant fenoterol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 66: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum P, Gronborg H, Brodfeldt S, Mygind N (1983) Nasal reactivity in rhinitis. Eur J Respir Dis 64: [Suppl 128] 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet J, Lebel B, Chanal I, Morel A, Michel FB (1988) Antiallergic activity of H1 receptor antagonists assessed by nasal challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 82: 881–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks CD, Nelson AL, Metzler C (1984) Effect of flurbiprofen, a cyclooxygenase inhibiting drug, on induced rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 73: 584–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J, Perhach JL, Weiler JM, Rosenthal R, Hamilton L, Diamond L, Newton JJ (1985) Azelastine (AZ), a new antiallergic agent: efficacy in ragweed hay fever. Ann Allergy 55: 392 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillier P, Dessanges JF, Rakotosihanaka F, Ghaem A, Boushey HA, Lockhart A, Marsac J (1988) Nasal response to substance P and methacholine in subjects with and without allergic rhinitis. Eur Respir J 1: 356–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvoracek JE, Hillis A, Rossing RG (1985) Comparison of sequential anterior and posterior rhinomanometry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76: 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson MJ, Youlten JF, Shelton DM, Siodlack MZ, Eiser NM, Wengraf CL (1986) Assessment of nasal airway patency: a comparison of four methods. Clin Otolaryngol 11: 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg K, Pipkorn U, Bake B, Blychert LO (1989) Effects of topical treatment with H1 and H2 antagonists on clinical symptoms and nasal vascular reactions in patients with allergic rhinitis. Allergy 44: 281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Klementsson H, Andersson M, Pipkorn U (1990) Allergen-induced increase in non specific nasal reactivity is blocked by anti-histamines without a clear-cut relationship to eosinophils influx. J Allergy Clin Immunol 86: 466–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolly M, Pecoud A (1986) Comparison of levocarbastine, a new selective H1-receptor antagonist, and disodium cromoglycate, nasal provocation test with allergen. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22: 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean JA, Bacon JR, Mathews KP, Banas J, Capati D, Bayne NK (1983) Effect of aspirin on nasal responses in atopic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 72: 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • McTavish D, Sorkin EM (1989) Azelastine, a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential. Drugs 38: 778–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer EO, Storms WW, Pierson WE, Cummins LH, Orgel HA, Perhach JL, Hemsworth GR (1988) Efficacy of azelastine in perennial allergic rhinitis: clinical and rhinomanometric evaluation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 82: 447–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Perhach JL, Connell J, Hamilton L, Diamond L, Weiler J, Melvin J (1984) Multicenter trial of azelastine in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 73: 144 [abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkorn U, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM, Kagey-sabotka A, Norman PS, Naclerio RM (1987) Inhibition of mediator release in allergic rhinitis by pretreatment with topical glucocorticosteroids. N Engl J Med 316: 1506–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokenes HL, Andersson B, Rundcrantz H (1988) Effect of terfenadine and placebo on symptoms after nasal allergen provocation. Clin Allergy 18: 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Small P, Barrett D, Biskin N (1990) Effects of azatadine, terfenadine and astemizole on allergen-induced nasal provocation. Ann Allergy 64: 129–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler JM, Rhodes BJ, Iwamoto PKL, Donnelly AL, Perhach JL (1986) Effectiveness and safety of azelastine in a chronic study in patients with allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 77: 180 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wihl JA, Malm L (1988) Rhinomanometry and nasal peak expiratory and inspiratory flow rate. Ann Allergy 61: 50–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lurie, A., Saudubray, F., Eychenne, J.L. et al. Azelastine reduces allergen-induced nasal response: a clinical and rhinomanometric assessment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42, 213–216 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278487

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278487

Key words

Navigation